Eliminating The Need for Sequential Confirmation of Response in Multiple Myeloma

Disease response and progression assessment in multiple myeloma is based on various measurements of monoclonal protein (serum and urine protein electrophoresis, serum free light chain, and/or quantitative immunoglobulins). Currently, the International Myeloma Working Group consensus response criteria require 2 sequential assessments of any 1 marker made at any time before confirmation of disease progression and the institution of any new therapy. However, this can be cumbersome in clinical trials. Herein, we hypothesized that if 2 markers meet the progression criteria simultaneously, a repeat of either will not be necessary for confirmation. We retrospectively studied all sequential patients with myeloma enrolled in clinical trials at Mayo Clinic. We identified 583 episodes of confirmed progression in our study. Among the 583 progression episodes, nearly 70% (sensitivity of the simultaneous criteria) met the 2 simultaneous variable criteria at the first testing, indicating progression. Conversely, among 413 patients who met progression criteria by 2 simultaneous values, 98% (specificity of the simultaneous criteria) of patients subsequently had confirmed progression by sequential values. In summary, for patients with 2 disease burden markers meeting the simultaneous progression criteria, sequential assessment of either 1 for confirmation may not be necessary to determine disease progression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024027949
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eliminating The Need for Sequential Confirmation of Response in Multiple Myeloma

Angela A. Dispenzieri, David Dingli, Francis K. Buadi, Morie A. Gertz et al.
1 citations
Blood
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
1.77
article

Eliminating The Need for Sequential Confirmation of Response in Multiple Myeloma

Angela A. Dispenzieri, David Dingli, Francis K. Buadi, Morie A. Gertz, Nelson Leung, Robert A. Kyle, Shaji Kunnathu Kumar, Yi Lin, Prashant Kapoor, Amie Fonder, Moritz Binder, Leslie J. Christenson, Rahma Warsame, S. Vincent Rajkumar, Jean‐Sébastien Claveau, Wilson I. Gonsalves, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Martha Q. Lacy, Suzanne R. Hayman, Miriam Hobbs
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Disease response and progression assessment in multiple myeloma is based on various measurements of monoclonal protein (serum and urine protein electrophoresis, serum free light chain, and/or quantitative immunoglobulins). Currently, the International Myeloma Working Group consensus response criteria require 2 sequential assessments of any 1 marker made at any time before confirmation of disease progression and the institution of any new therapy. However, this can be cumbersome in clinical trials. Herein, we hypothesized that if 2 markers meet the progression criteria simultaneously, a repeat of either will not be necessary for confirmation. We retrospectively studied all sequential patients with myeloma enrolled in clinical trials at Mayo Clinic. We identified 583 episodes of confirmed progression in our study. Among the 583 progression episodes, nearly 70% (sensitivity of the simultaneous criteria) met the 2 simultaneous variable criteria at the first testing, indicating progression. Conversely, among 413 patients who met progression criteria by 2 simultaneous values, 98% (specificity of the simultaneous criteria) of patients subsequently had confirmed progression by sequential values. In summary, for patients with 2 disease burden markers meeting the simultaneous progression criteria, sequential assessment of either 1 for confirmation may not be necessary to determine disease progression.

BloodVol. 146(7)
Mayo Clinic (US), Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
1.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.