Optimal Bounds for Private Minimum Spanning Trees via Input Perturbation

We study the problem of privately releasing an approximate minimum spanning tree (MST). Given a graph G = ( V , E , W ) where V is a set of n vertices, E is a set of m undirected edges, and W ∈ ℝ |E| is an edge-weight vector, our goal is to publish an approximate MST under edge-weight differential privacy, as introduced by Sealfon in PODS 2016, where V and E are considered public and the weight vector is private. Our neighboring relation is 𝓁 ∞ -distance on weights: for a sensitivity parameter Δ ∞ , graphs G = ( V , E , W ) and G' = ( V , E , W ') are neighboring if || W - W '|| ∞ ≤ Δ ∞ ). Existing private MST algorithms face a trade-off, sacrificing either computational efficiency or accuracy. We show that it is possible to get the best of both worlds: With a suitable random perturbation of the input that does not suffice to make the weight vector private, the result of any non-private MST algorithm will be private and achieves a state-of-the-art error guarantee. Furthermore, by establishing a connection to Private Top-k Selection [Steinke and Ullman, FOCS '17], we give the first privacy-utility trade-off lower bound for MST under approximate differential privacy, demonstrating that the error magnitude, ~O(n 3/2 ), is optimal up to logarithmic factors. That is, our approach matches the time complexity of any non-private MST algorithm and at the same time achieves optimal error. We complement our theoretical treatment with experiments that confirm the practicality of our approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3725240
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Bounds for Private Minimum Spanning Trees via Input Perturbation

Rasmus Pagh, H. H. Zhang, Hao Wu, Lukas Retschmeier
1 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
article

Optimal Bounds for Private Minimum Spanning Trees via Input Perturbation

Rasmus Pagh, H. H. Zhang, Hao Wu, Lukas Retschmeier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We study the problem of privately releasing an approximate minimum spanning tree (MST). Given a graph G = ( V , E , W ) where V is a set of n vertices, E is a set of m undirected edges, and W ∈ ℝ |E| is an edge-weight vector, our goal is to publish an approximate MST under edge-weight differential privacy, as introduced by Sealfon in PODS 2016, where V and E are considered public and the weight vector is private. Our neighboring relation is 𝓁 ∞ -distance on weights: for a sensitivity parameter Δ ∞ , graphs G = ( V , E , W ) and G' = ( V , E , W ') are neighboring if || W - W '|| ∞ ≤ Δ ∞ ). Existing private MST algorithms face a trade-off, sacrificing either computational efficiency or accuracy. We show that it is possible to get the best of both worlds: With a suitable random perturbation of the input that does not suffice to make the weight vector private, the result of any non-private MST algorithm will be private and achieves a state-of-the-art error guarantee. Furthermore, by establishing a connection to Private Top-k Selection [Steinke and Ullman, FOCS '17], we give the first privacy-utility trade-off lower bound for MST under approximate differential privacy, demonstrating that the error magnitude, ~O(n 3/2 ), is optimal up to logarithmic factors. That is, our approach matches the time complexity of any non-private MST algorithm and at the same time achieves optimal error. We complement our theoretical treatment with experiments that confirm the practicality of our approach.

Proceedings of the ACM on Management of DataVol. 3(2)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Waterloo (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.