AS RELAÇÕES ENTRE PÚBLICO E PRIVADO NO CAPITALISMO CONTEMPORÂNEO

This article examines the relationships between public, private, and social responsibility within the context of monopolistic capitalism in Brazil, adopting a theoretical perspective. It explores Jürgen Habermas and Hannah Arendt’s conceptions of the public sphere, highlighting their differences: Habermas links it to the bourgeois state and public opinion, while Arendt associates it with freedom and the common space of the polis. In Brazil, the lack of distinction between public and private, shaped by clientelism, patrimonialism, and “cordiality” (Holanda, 1984), hinders the development of a democratic public sphere. The privatization of public services and the devaluation of the public space, intensified by neoliberalism, support capitalist accumulation. Corporate social responsibility is viewed as a strategy to legitimize capital, masking labor exploitation and social exclusion through clientelist philanthropy. The text advocates for reclaiming the public sphere as a space for the common good through the struggles of dominated classes for citizenship and democracy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Aracê.
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n6-078
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AS RELAÇÕES ENTRE PÚBLICO E PRIVADO NO CAPITALISMO CONTEMPORÂNEO

João Roberto Oliveira do Nascimento, M. Silva, Eliane Almeida do Carmo, Marsis Cabral et al.
Aracê.
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

AS RELAÇÕES ENTRE PÚBLICO E PRIVADO NO CAPITALISMO CONTEMPORÂNEO

João Roberto Oliveira do Nascimento, M. Silva, Eliane Almeida do Carmo, Marsis Cabral, Roque do Nascimento Albuquerque, Mara Rita Duarte de Oliveira Berraoui, Tiago Melo
article en

Abstract

This article examines the relationships between public, private, and social responsibility within the context of monopolistic capitalism in Brazil, adopting a theoretical perspective. It explores Jürgen Habermas and Hannah Arendt’s conceptions of the public sphere, highlighting their differences: Habermas links it to the bourgeois state and public opinion, while Arendt associates it with freedom and the common space of the polis. In Brazil, the lack of distinction between public and private, shaped by clientelism, patrimonialism, and “cordiality” (Holanda, 1984), hinders the development of a democratic public sphere. The privatization of public services and the devaluation of the public space, intensified by neoliberalism, support capitalist accumulation. Corporate social responsibility is viewed as a strategy to legitimize capital, masking labor exploitation and social exclusion through clientelist philanthropy. The text advocates for reclaiming the public sphere as a space for the common good through the struggles of dominated classes for citizenship and democracy.

Aracê.Vol. 7(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.