Double Vitrification-Warming Cycles Reduce Live Birth Rates in Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfers: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of blastocysts biopsied once and vitrified twice on clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 277 single euploid blastocyst transfer cycles conducted at the Center for Assisted Reproduction, 16A Ha Dong General Hospital, from March 2018 to January 2024. Cycles were stratified into two groups: Group BV (biopsied once, vitrified once; n = 207) and Group VBV (biopsied once, vitrified twice; n = 70). Pregnancy outcomes were compared between groups, and a binary logistic regression model identified variables associated with live birth rates. Results: Group BV demonstrated superior outcomes compared to Group VBV across all metrics: implantation rate (55.6% vs. 37.1%, p < 0.001), clinical pregnancy rate (55.1% vs. 37.1%, p < 0.001), ongoing pregnancy rate (54.1% vs. 35.7%, p < 0.001), and live birth rate (53.6% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.01). The number of vitrification-warming cycles was the only factor significantly associated with reduced live birth rates (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01–3.78, p < 0.05). Conclusions: An additional vitrification-warming cycle significantly reduces pregnancy success in single euploid blastocyst transfers. Patients undergoing PGT-A should be explicitly counseled about the potential decline in success rates if previously vitrified blastocysts undergo repeated warming cycles for diagnostic confirmation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Research and Therapy
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15419/bmrat.v12i5.978
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Double Vitrification-Warming Cycles Reduce Live Birth Rates in Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfers: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Phuc Nguyen Hong, Tae-Ik Ha, Linh Pham, Toan Ngo Van et al.
Biomedical Research and Therapy
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
article

Double Vitrification-Warming Cycles Reduce Live Birth Rates in Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfers: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Phuc Nguyen Hong, Tae-Ik Ha, Linh Pham, Toan Ngo Van, T. T. N. Dinh, Thuy Tran Thi, Dung Le Thi Thuy, Luan Nguyen Thanh
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of blastocysts biopsied once and vitrified twice on clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 277 single euploid blastocyst transfer cycles conducted at the Center for Assisted Reproduction, 16A Ha Dong General Hospital, from March 2018 to January 2024. Cycles were stratified into two groups: Group BV (biopsied once, vitrified once; n = 207) and Group VBV (biopsied once, vitrified twice; n = 70). Pregnancy outcomes were compared between groups, and a binary logistic regression model identified variables associated with live birth rates. Results: Group BV demonstrated superior outcomes compared to Group VBV across all metrics: implantation rate (55.6% vs. 37.1%, p < 0.001), clinical pregnancy rate (55.1% vs. 37.1%, p < 0.001), ongoing pregnancy rate (54.1% vs. 35.7%, p < 0.001), and live birth rate (53.6% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.01). The number of vitrification-warming cycles was the only factor significantly associated with reduced live birth rates (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01–3.78, p < 0.05). Conclusions: An additional vitrification-warming cycle significantly reduces pregnancy success in single euploid blastocyst transfers. Patients undergoing PGT-A should be explicitly counseled about the potential decline in success rates if previously vitrified blastocysts undergo repeated warming cycles for diagnostic confirmation.

Biomedical Research and TherapyVol. 12(5)
Hanoi Medical University (VN), Hai phong University Of Medicine and Pharmacy (VN), Dong Thap Hospital (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.