EFL Students’ Perspectives on ChatGPT in Translation: Exploring AI Assistance, Motivation, and Learning Outcomes

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising opportunities to improve language education, particularly in translation, by providing tools that can enhance both learning processes and outcomes. Yet, how these AI tools are perceived and integrated, especially in areas that demand cultural sensitivity and a nuanced understanding, has not been fully explored, notably from the perspective of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. This study set out to examine how English major students view the use of ChatGPT, a text-based generative AI tool, within translation classes, using the Expectation-Value Theory as a framework. The study involved 62 junior English majors from a university in Vietnam and employed a mixed-methods approach, including pre- and post-course surveys, reflective journals, focus group interviews, and analysis of course grades. Results showed that students generally regarded ChatGPT as a helpful tool for improving translation accuracy, efficiency, and vocabulary skills. They valued its capacity to simplify complex translation challenges, improve sentence flow, and offer a variety of lexical choices, which in turn boosted their motivation and confidence. Students also mentioned that using ChatGPT helped promote collaborative learning by sparking more group discussions, which improved their translation skills. At the same time, they pointed out some limitations, especially how ChatGPT struggled with cultural nuances and idiomatic expressions. Because of this, students had to carefully review and adjust the AI’s suggestions themselves. The study points out that it’s really important to strike a balance between relying on AI tools and sticking with traditional, hands-on translation methods. Tools like ChatGPT can definitely support translation learning, but they can’t take the place of human judgment and effort. When looking at why students were motivated to use ChatGPT, the research found that it mostly came down to how helpful they believed the tool was, how much they valued using it, and how confident they felt about succeeding with it. These factors played a key role in their overall learning results. The study provides useful insights into how AI tools can support online learning by making it more efficient and engaging. However, it also reminds us that human judgment remains crucial, especially in translation tasks that involve cultural understanding. More research is needed to understand the long-term effects of AI in translation education and how well these tools work across different cultural settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.23.2.4006
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFL Students’ Perspectives on ChatGPT in Translation: Exploring AI Assistance, Motivation, and Learning Outcomes

Tuong Cao Dinh
2 citations
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

EFL Students’ Perspectives on ChatGPT in Translation: Exploring AI Assistance, Motivation, and Learning Outcomes

Tuong Cao Dinh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising opportunities to improve language education, particularly in translation, by providing tools that can enhance both learning processes and outcomes. Yet, how these AI tools are perceived and integrated, especially in areas that demand cultural sensitivity and a nuanced understanding, has not been fully explored, notably from the perspective of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. This study set out to examine how English major students view the use of ChatGPT, a text-based generative AI tool, within translation classes, using the Expectation-Value Theory as a framework. The study involved 62 junior English majors from a university in Vietnam and employed a mixed-methods approach, including pre- and post-course surveys, reflective journals, focus group interviews, and analysis of course grades. Results showed that students generally regarded ChatGPT as a helpful tool for improving translation accuracy, efficiency, and vocabulary skills. They valued its capacity to simplify complex translation challenges, improve sentence flow, and offer a variety of lexical choices, which in turn boosted their motivation and confidence. Students also mentioned that using ChatGPT helped promote collaborative learning by sparking more group discussions, which improved their translation skills. At the same time, they pointed out some limitations, especially how ChatGPT struggled with cultural nuances and idiomatic expressions. Because of this, students had to carefully review and adjust the AI’s suggestions themselves. The study points out that it’s really important to strike a balance between relying on AI tools and sticking with traditional, hands-on translation methods. Tools like ChatGPT can definitely support translation learning, but they can’t take the place of human judgment and effort. When looking at why students were motivated to use ChatGPT, the research found that it mostly came down to how helpful they believed the tool was, how much they valued using it, and how confident they felt about succeeding with it. These factors played a key role in their overall learning results. The study provides useful insights into how AI tools can support online learning by making it more efficient and engaging. However, it also reminds us that human judgment remains crucial, especially in translation tasks that involve cultural understanding. More research is needed to understand the long-term effects of AI in translation education and how well these tools work across different cultural settings.

The Electronic Journal of e-LearningVol. 23(2)
FPT University (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.