Incident COVID-19 infections before Omicron in the U.S.

The timing and magnitude of COVID-19 infections are of interest to the public and to public health, but these are challenging to ascertain due to the volume of undetected asymptomatic cases and reporting delays. Accurate estimates of COVID-19 infections based on finalized data can improve understanding of the pandemic and provide more meaningful quantification of disease patterns and burden. Therefore, we retrospectively estimate daily incident infections for each U.S. state prior to Omicron. To this end, reported COVID-19 cases are deconvolved to their likely date of infection onset using delay distributions estimated from the CDC line list. Then, a novel serology-driven model is used to scale these deconvolved cases to account for the unreported infections. The resulting infection estimates incorporate variant-specific incubation periods, reinfections, and waning antigenic immunity. They clearly demonstrate that reported cases failed to reflect the full extent of disease burden in all states. Most notably, infections were severely underreported during the Delta wave, with an estimated reporting rate as low as 6.3% in New Jersey, 7.3% in Maryland, and 8.4% in Nevada. Moreover, in 44 states, fewer than 1/3 of infections eventually appeared as case reports, and there were sustained periods where surges in infections were virtually undetectable through reported cases. This pattern was clearly illustrated by North and South Dakota during the spring of 2021, as well as by several Northeastern states during the Delta wave of late summer that year. While reported cases offered a convenient proxy of disease burden, they failed to capture the full extent of infections and severely underestimated the true disease burden. Our retrospective analysis also estimates other important quantities for every state, including variant-specific deconvolved cases, time-varying case ascertainment ratios, as well as infection-hospitalization and infection-fatality ratios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemics
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2025.100838
Citations
3
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incident COVID-19 infections before Omicron in the U.S.

Ajitesh Srivastava, Daniel J. McDonald, Ryan J. Tibshirani, Rachel Lobay
3 citations
Epidemics
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
4.10
article

Incident COVID-19 infections before Omicron in the U.S.

Ajitesh Srivastava, Daniel J. McDonald, Ryan J. Tibshirani, Rachel Lobay
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The timing and magnitude of COVID-19 infections are of interest to the public and to public health, but these are challenging to ascertain due to the volume of undetected asymptomatic cases and reporting delays. Accurate estimates of COVID-19 infections based on finalized data can improve understanding of the pandemic and provide more meaningful quantification of disease patterns and burden. Therefore, we retrospectively estimate daily incident infections for each U.S. state prior to Omicron. To this end, reported COVID-19 cases are deconvolved to their likely date of infection onset using delay distributions estimated from the CDC line list. Then, a novel serology-driven model is used to scale these deconvolved cases to account for the unreported infections. The resulting infection estimates incorporate variant-specific incubation periods, reinfections, and waning antigenic immunity. They clearly demonstrate that reported cases failed to reflect the full extent of disease burden in all states. Most notably, infections were severely underreported during the Delta wave, with an estimated reporting rate as low as 6.3% in New Jersey, 7.3% in Maryland, and 8.4% in Nevada. Moreover, in 44 states, fewer than 1/3 of infections eventually appeared as case reports, and there were sustained periods where surges in infections were virtually undetectable through reported cases. This pattern was clearly illustrated by North and South Dakota during the spring of 2021, as well as by several Northeastern states during the Delta wave of late summer that year. While reported cases offered a convenient proxy of disease burden, they failed to capture the full extent of infections and severely underestimated the true disease burden. Our retrospective analysis also estimates other important quantities for every state, including variant-specific deconvolved cases, time-varying case ascertainment ratios, as well as infection-hospitalization and infection-fatality ratios.

EpidemicsVol. 52
University of Southern California (US), University of British Columbia (CA), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation, University of British Columbia, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
4.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.