Translation Quality Assessment in Court Interpreting

The current study investigates the quality assessment of interpreting in courtrooms. This study aims at examining the accuracy of interpreting in courts. The data of the study comprise a trail Arabic girl named Tahani in the Providence court in Rhode Island state. To assess the interpreting quality, the model of Pöchhacker & Shlesinger (2008) of interpreting quality assessment is adopted. The study presents an overview of interpreting by comparing it with the activity of translating. Then, it examines the concept of court interpreting and the types of interpreting used in courts. The study also explores the parameters or criteria usually used to assess the quality of interpreting. The analysis of the selected data reveals that the interpreter violates these criteria in some cases. It shows the frequencies and the percentages of the violated criteria and presents the overall findings and conclusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Port Science Research
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36371/port.2025.3.14
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation Quality Assessment in Court Interpreting

A. A. Alasadi
Journal Port Science Research
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
article

Translation Quality Assessment in Court Interpreting

A. A. Alasadi
article en

Abstract

The current study investigates the quality assessment of interpreting in courtrooms. This study aims at examining the accuracy of interpreting in courts. The data of the study comprise a trail Arabic girl named Tahani in the Providence court in Rhode Island state. To assess the interpreting quality, the model of Pöchhacker & Shlesinger (2008) of interpreting quality assessment is adopted. The study presents an overview of interpreting by comparing it with the activity of translating. Then, it examines the concept of court interpreting and the types of interpreting used in courts. The study also explores the parameters or criteria usually used to assess the quality of interpreting. The analysis of the selected data reveals that the interpreter violates these criteria in some cases. It shows the frequencies and the percentages of the violated criteria and presents the overall findings and conclusions.

Journal Port Science ResearchVol. 8(3)
University of Baghdad (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.