Varieties of Chinese capital in African agriculture: A bounded improvisation analysis

• Chinese investors in Africa are categorized as cooperative competitors, flying geese, and footloose opportunists. • Chinese investors adapt their strategies according to local land tenure institutions. • The study provides rich empirical insights, based on 139 interviews and 28 case studies across Zambia and Tanzania. • The investor typology is applicable beyond African agriculture to analyse China’s international economic footprint. Debates on Chinese state capitalism and agribusiness expansion have focused on issues of China’s overseas agricultural land investments. While China-focused analyses have deepened our understanding of the complex dynamics between Chinese state-business relations and the diverse regimes of capital export, they often overlook the institutional complexities of host countries. This study addresses that gap by investigating the interplay between the agency of different types of Chinese investors and the land tenure institutions in Tanzania and Zambia. I conceptualize three distinct types of Chinese investors – cooperative competitors, flying geese, and footloose opportunists—each characterized by unique drivers and objectives for internationalization. I further theorize how these investors navigate, adapt to, and improvise within the constraints of host-state land tenure systems. Drawing on 28 comparative cases collected through multiple field trips, the analysis highlights both the differences among Chinese firms operating in the same institutional setting and the varying strategies employed by similar firms across different regulatory environments. The typology developed in this study not only sheds light on the diverse and adaptive strategies of Chinese overseas investors but also provides broader insights into how firms engage with institutional constraints across sectors and beyond Africa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Development
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107091
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
48.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Varieties of Chinese capital in African agriculture: A bounded improvisation analysis

Yuezhou Yang
10 citations
World Development
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
48.32
article

Varieties of Chinese capital in African agriculture: A bounded improvisation analysis

Yuezhou Yang
article en
10 citations

Abstract

• Chinese investors in Africa are categorized as cooperative competitors, flying geese, and footloose opportunists. • Chinese investors adapt their strategies according to local land tenure institutions. • The study provides rich empirical insights, based on 139 interviews and 28 case studies across Zambia and Tanzania. • The investor typology is applicable beyond African agriculture to analyse China’s international economic footprint. Debates on Chinese state capitalism and agribusiness expansion have focused on issues of China’s overseas agricultural land investments. While China-focused analyses have deepened our understanding of the complex dynamics between Chinese state-business relations and the diverse regimes of capital export, they often overlook the institutional complexities of host countries. This study addresses that gap by investigating the interplay between the agency of different types of Chinese investors and the land tenure institutions in Tanzania and Zambia. I conceptualize three distinct types of Chinese investors – cooperative competitors, flying geese, and footloose opportunists—each characterized by unique drivers and objectives for internationalization. I further theorize how these investors navigate, adapt to, and improvise within the constraints of host-state land tenure systems. Drawing on 28 comparative cases collected through multiple field trips, the analysis highlights both the differences among Chinese firms operating in the same institutional setting and the varying strategies employed by similar firms across different regulatory environments. The typology developed in this study not only sheds light on the diverse and adaptive strategies of Chinese overseas investors but also provides broader insights into how firms engage with institutional constraints across sectors and beyond Africa.

World DevelopmentVol. 195
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Fudan University, China Scholarship Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
48.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.