Public transport and the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis of trends and policies in Great Britain, Germany, the USA, Canada, and Australia

This paper compares changes in urban public transport (PT) demand and supply before, during, and after COVID-19 in Great Britain, Germany, the USA, Canada, and Australia. We also examine a range of PT system measures and government policies implemented during and since the pandemic to improve safety, adjust service levels, and encourage ridership. Ridership fell sharply in 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 rates were highest. As a percentage of 2019 levels, the lowest annual ridership for each country was 31% for Great Britain, 42% for Canada, 46% for the USA, 48% for Australia, and 64% in Germany. The latest full year of available data (2024) indicates that Germany (94%), Great Britain (90%), and Australia (90%) recovered the highest percentages of 2019 ridership levels, compared to 83% in Canada and 77% in the USA. Bus ridership declined less than rail ridership and recovered more fully, especially in the USA, Canada, and Australia. Our analysis of PT in five large cities finds that recovery rates were generally higher on weekends than on weekdays, both for bus and rail. The most important government policy for PT has been a massive increase in funding, especially from central governments, to offset the large operating budget deficits resulting from lost passenger revenue. That funding enabled PT systems to maintain or reduce fares while avoiding large reductions in supply. Dependable government support will be necessary in the coming years to make PT financially sustainable and to enable long-term planning for infrastructure modernization and improved service.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104549
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public transport and the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis of trends and policies in Great Britain, Germany, the USA, Canada, and Australia

Ralph Buehler, John R. Pucher, Peter J White, G A Currie
6 citations
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Urban Transport and Accessibility
13.06
article

Public transport and the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis of trends and policies in Great Britain, Germany, the USA, Canada, and Australia

Ralph Buehler, John R. Pucher, Peter J White, G A Currie
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This paper compares changes in urban public transport (PT) demand and supply before, during, and after COVID-19 in Great Britain, Germany, the USA, Canada, and Australia. We also examine a range of PT system measures and government policies implemented during and since the pandemic to improve safety, adjust service levels, and encourage ridership. Ridership fell sharply in 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 rates were highest. As a percentage of 2019 levels, the lowest annual ridership for each country was 31% for Great Britain, 42% for Canada, 46% for the USA, 48% for Australia, and 64% in Germany. The latest full year of available data (2024) indicates that Germany (94%), Great Britain (90%), and Australia (90%) recovered the highest percentages of 2019 ridership levels, compared to 83% in Canada and 77% in the USA. Bus ridership declined less than rail ridership and recovered more fully, especially in the USA, Canada, and Australia. Our analysis of PT in five large cities finds that recovery rates were generally higher on weekends than on weekdays, both for bus and rail. The most important government policy for PT has been a massive increase in funding, especially from central governments, to offset the large operating budget deficits resulting from lost passenger revenue. That funding enabled PT systems to maintain or reduce fares while avoiding large reductions in supply. Dependable government support will be necessary in the coming years to make PT financially sustainable and to enable long-term planning for infrastructure modernization and improved service.

Transportation Research Part A Policy and PracticeVol. 199
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads (AU), Office of International Affairs (US), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), University of Westminster (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
13.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.