Personalizing probabilistic survey scales

Central bank surveys frequently elicit households’ probabilistic beliefs about future inflation by employing response scales centered around zero inflation. Analyzing data from the high-inflation period of 2022/2023, we demonstrate how this practice leads to distortions in households’ responses, causing inconsistencies and resulting in biased estimates of both mean inflation expectations and uncertainty. In two large-scale randomized experiments, we show that shifting the response scale to better align with households’ current expectations improves response quality. The greatest improvements are observed when the response scale is centered on each household’s point forecast. This personalized approach significantly increases the quality of responses by reducing inconsistencies, decreasing the use of unbounded intervals, and lowering the frequency of bi-modal responses. Centering the response scale on point forecasts removes the need to adjust the scale when inflation falls outside the originally intended range and helps mitigate panel conditioning effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107072
Primary Topic
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalizing probabilistic survey scales

Thomas Eife, Alexander Glas, Christoph K. Becker, Peter Duersch
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
article

Personalizing probabilistic survey scales

Thomas Eife, Alexander Glas, Christoph K. Becker, Peter Duersch
article en

Abstract

Central bank surveys frequently elicit households’ probabilistic beliefs about future inflation by employing response scales centered around zero inflation. Analyzing data from the high-inflation period of 2022/2023, we demonstrate how this practice leads to distortions in households’ responses, causing inconsistencies and resulting in biased estimates of both mean inflation expectations and uncertainty. In two large-scale randomized experiments, we show that shifting the response scale to better align with households’ current expectations improves response quality. The greatest improvements are observed when the response scale is centered on each household’s point forecast. This personalized approach significantly increases the quality of responses by reducing inconsistencies, decreasing the use of unbounded intervals, and lowering the frequency of bi-modal responses. Centering the response scale on point forecasts removes the need to adjust the scale when inflation falls outside the originally intended range and helps mitigate panel conditioning effects.

Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationVol. 236
University of Mannheim (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Deutsche Bundesbank (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Personalizing probabilistic survey scales — Thomas Eife, Alexander Glas, et al. · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS