Using lattice and hollow architected polymeric reinforcement to improve flexural performance of cementitious composite

Engineered materials, unlike natural counterparts, often suffer from obtaining competing mechanical properties. This study examines the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polymeric reinforcements with architected designs of cementitious composites inspired by natural reinforcement. A systematic process was developed to determine the reinforcement configurations with different architected design motifs while maintaining the reinforcement ratio constant. Using three-point bending tests, two classes of reinforcements were investigated: (1) lattice-architected polymer including Sinusoidal, Hexagonal, and Kagome, and (2) hollow-architected polymer including Simple and Hierarchical hollow tube(s). Micro-computed tomography ( µ -CT) was utilized to investigate the fracture patterns in lattice-architected samples. The flexural behavior of cementitious composite beams was then compared to reference unreinforced mortar beams. The findings illustrate that the modulus of rupture, toughness, and ductility were enhanced by introducing architected 3D-printed polymeric constituents into mortar as reinforcements compared to the unreinforced beam. Hollow reinforcements mechanically outperformed the lattice class in both strength and toughness. µ -CT results demonstrate the presence of crack at the interface of the polymer and cementitious mortar in the composite samples with lattice-architected reinforcement, signifying the importance of interface properties. The composite samples reinforced with hollow-architected polymeric constituents on the other hand, demonstrate reinforcement rupture rather than presence of crack at the interface, contributing to a higher flexural strength and mid-span deflection. • Macro-architectural motifs were introduced in reinforcement design of mortar beams. • Architected reinforcements improved modulus of rupture, toughness, and ductility. • Architectures enhanced the failure mechanism through additional fracture patterns. • Hollow architectures outperformed lattice designs in strength and toughness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Building Materials
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142124
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using lattice and hollow architected polymeric reinforcement to improve flexural performance of cementitious composite

Parsa Namakiaraghi, E.T. Yen, Yaghoob Farnam
3 citations
Construction and Building Materials
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
2.86
article

Using lattice and hollow architected polymeric reinforcement to improve flexural performance of cementitious composite

Parsa Namakiaraghi, E.T. Yen, Yaghoob Farnam
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Engineered materials, unlike natural counterparts, often suffer from obtaining competing mechanical properties. This study examines the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polymeric reinforcements with architected designs of cementitious composites inspired by natural reinforcement. A systematic process was developed to determine the reinforcement configurations with different architected design motifs while maintaining the reinforcement ratio constant. Using three-point bending tests, two classes of reinforcements were investigated: (1) lattice-architected polymer including Sinusoidal, Hexagonal, and Kagome, and (2) hollow-architected polymer including Simple and Hierarchical hollow tube(s). Micro-computed tomography ( µ -CT) was utilized to investigate the fracture patterns in lattice-architected samples. The flexural behavior of cementitious composite beams was then compared to reference unreinforced mortar beams. The findings illustrate that the modulus of rupture, toughness, and ductility were enhanced by introducing architected 3D-printed polymeric constituents into mortar as reinforcements compared to the unreinforced beam. Hollow reinforcements mechanically outperformed the lattice class in both strength and toughness. µ -CT results demonstrate the presence of crack at the interface of the polymer and cementitious mortar in the composite samples with lattice-architected reinforcement, signifying the importance of interface properties. The composite samples reinforced with hollow-architected polymeric constituents on the other hand, demonstrate reinforcement rupture rather than presence of crack at the interface, contributing to a higher flexural strength and mid-span deflection. • Macro-architectural motifs were introduced in reinforcement design of mortar beams. • Architected reinforcements improved modulus of rupture, toughness, and ductility. • Architectures enhanced the failure mechanism through additional fracture patterns. • Hollow architectures outperformed lattice designs in strength and toughness.

Construction and Building MaterialsVol. 487
Drexel University (US)
Drexel University
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.