Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> Documents Ecosystem‐Wide Biodiversity Within the Marine Protected Area Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary

ABSTRACT Marine protected areas (MPAs) can help ensure long‐term conservation of natural resources and protect biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural values in the face of anthropogenic change. However, determining MPA effectiveness is often challenging due to the lack of comprehensive baseline data and/or biases associated with biodiversity survey methods. Environmental DNA (eDNA) represents a promising tool to overcome these challenges. Here, we used a suite of three metabarcoding targets—prokaryote‐specific 16S, eukaryote‐specific 18S, and vertebrate‐specific 12S—to generate baseline data of all organisms, from bacteria to whales, within Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary (SBNMS). Surface water, bottom water, and sediment from 40 sites revealed three archaeal, 46 bacterial, 22 protistan, and 17 metazoan phyla. eDNA offers insight into the spatial resolution of biodiversity within SBNMS, potentially providing a new tool which could inform management practices to protect biodiversity. For vertebrate eDNA monitoring, most species were observed in bottom water, suggesting that less extensive sampling could be sufficient if targeting overall vertebrate richness. However, the inclusion of other sample types revealed patterns in relative sequence abundance that may be indicative of habitat use, particularly for Northern sand lance, a key forage fish. Microbial, phytoplankton, and zooplankton community composition differed dramatically between sample types, requiring all three to adequately capture species richness, providing data for potential indicator species such as those that cause harmful algal blooms. While future evaluations of cost, sampling scope, frequency, and how to incorporate data into management practices are needed, this study offers important baseline information for new hypotheses testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental DNA
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70138
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental DNA Documents Ecosystem‐Wide Biodiversity Within the Marine Protected Area Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary

Tammy L. Silva, Emma Strand, David N. Wiley, Matthew J. Harke et al.
2 citations
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
3.43
article

Environmental DNA Documents Ecosystem‐Wide Biodiversity Within the Marine Protected Area Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary

Tammy L. Silva, Emma Strand, David N. Wiley, Matthew J. Harke, Jennifer M. Polinski, Timothy P. O’Donnell
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Marine protected areas (MPAs) can help ensure long‐term conservation of natural resources and protect biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural values in the face of anthropogenic change. However, determining MPA effectiveness is often challenging due to the lack of comprehensive baseline data and/or biases associated with biodiversity survey methods. Environmental DNA (eDNA) represents a promising tool to overcome these challenges. Here, we used a suite of three metabarcoding targets—prokaryote‐specific 16S, eukaryote‐specific 18S, and vertebrate‐specific 12S—to generate baseline data of all organisms, from bacteria to whales, within Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary (SBNMS). Surface water, bottom water, and sediment from 40 sites revealed three archaeal, 46 bacterial, 22 protistan, and 17 metazoan phyla. eDNA offers insight into the spatial resolution of biodiversity within SBNMS, potentially providing a new tool which could inform management practices to protect biodiversity. For vertebrate eDNA monitoring, most species were observed in bottom water, suggesting that less extensive sampling could be sufficient if targeting overall vertebrate richness. However, the inclusion of other sample types revealed patterns in relative sequence abundance that may be indicative of habitat use, particularly for Northern sand lance, a key forage fish. Microbial, phytoplankton, and zooplankton community composition differed dramatically between sample types, requiring all three to adequately capture species richness, providing data for potential indicator species such as those that cause harmful algal blooms. While future evaluations of cost, sampling scope, frequency, and how to incorporate data into management practices are needed, this study offers important baseline information for new hypotheses testing.

Environmental DNAVol. 7(3)
National Marine Sanctuary Foundation (US), Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute (US), Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.