SIU-ICUD: Localized Prostate Cancer: Pathological Factors That Influence Outcomes and Management

Background/Objectives: Pathological factors are integral in the risk stratification and management of localized prostate cancer. In recent years, there has been an upsurge of studies that uncovered novel approaches and have refined prognostic factors for prostate cancer in needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. Methods: We conducted a review of literature and summarized the significant recent updates on pathological factors for localized prostate cancer. Results: Innovative factors derived from the traditional Gleason grading, such as the extent of Gleason pattern 4 and presence of cribriform pattern are now recognized to significantly improve discrimination of outcome. The components and rules of Gleason grading themselves underwent modifications, and the subsequent prognostic grouping of the different grades (Grade group) have resulted in enhanced stratification of behavior more meaningful in management decision. The approaches for grade reporting in systematic or targeted needle biopsies and in RP with multifocal cancers are also being optimized. Newer tumor growth pattern-based factors such as intraductal carcinoma and atypical intraductal proliferation can have ramifications in management, especially in the background of low to intermediate risk prostate cancers. Gleason grade considerations in the different post-treatment settings and for de novo and residual prostate cancers with varying treatment effects have also been explicated. Likewise, the application of more traditional factors in tumor extent and perineural invasion in biopsy, or positive surgical margin in RP, have also evolved. Conclusions: Some of these newer pathological factors are now officially recommended in standardized pathology reporting protocols and are applied in the management decision for localized prostate cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj6030041
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SIU-ICUD: Localized Prostate Cancer: Pathological Factors That Influence Outcomes and Management

Glen Kristiansen, Samson W. Fine, Gladell P. Paner, Éva Compérat et al.
2 citations
Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
3.04
article

SIU-ICUD: Localized Prostate Cancer: Pathological Factors That Influence Outcomes and Management

Glen Kristiansen, Samson W. Fine, Gladell P. Paner, Éva Compérat, Rajal B. Shah, Steven C. Smith, Geert J.L.H. van Leenders, James G. Kench, Ming Zhou, Mahul B. Amin, John R. Srigley, Murali Varma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Pathological factors are integral in the risk stratification and management of localized prostate cancer. In recent years, there has been an upsurge of studies that uncovered novel approaches and have refined prognostic factors for prostate cancer in needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. Methods: We conducted a review of literature and summarized the significant recent updates on pathological factors for localized prostate cancer. Results: Innovative factors derived from the traditional Gleason grading, such as the extent of Gleason pattern 4 and presence of cribriform pattern are now recognized to significantly improve discrimination of outcome. The components and rules of Gleason grading themselves underwent modifications, and the subsequent prognostic grouping of the different grades (Grade group) have resulted in enhanced stratification of behavior more meaningful in management decision. The approaches for grade reporting in systematic or targeted needle biopsies and in RP with multifocal cancers are also being optimized. Newer tumor growth pattern-based factors such as intraductal carcinoma and atypical intraductal proliferation can have ramifications in management, especially in the background of low to intermediate risk prostate cancers. Gleason grade considerations in the different post-treatment settings and for de novo and residual prostate cancers with varying treatment effects have also been explicated. Likewise, the application of more traditional factors in tumor extent and perineural invasion in biopsy, or positive surgical margin in RP, have also evolved. Conclusions: Some of these newer pathological factors are now officially recommended in standardized pathology reporting protocols and are applied in the management decision for localized prostate cancer.

Société Internationale d’Urologie JournalVol. 6(3)
University of Southern California (US), Tufts Medical Center (US), University of Vienna (AT), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of Toronto (CA), University Hospital Bonn (DE), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), University Hospital of Wales (GB), University of Chicago (US), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.