Comparison of Denver and Leeds laboratory flotation cells: Effect of particle size and hydrodynamics

In this paper, the authors performed experiments in the Denver and Leeds laboratory flotation devices1 at the University of Pretoria at various particle sizes to evaluate the performance of the devices. Quartz was used in a single mineral system at discrete sizes fractions, -25 µm, +2545 µm, +45-75 µm, and +75-106 µm. Hydrodynamic analysis, based on dimensionless power and Reynolds numbers, indicated that the Leeds cell required higher power input to achieve comparable flow conditions. Specifically, the Leeds cell exhibited an average power number of 1.03, whereas the Denver cell averaged 0.77 within the same impeller speed range of 1000 rpm-1500 rpm. For comparative flotation performance, impeller speeds were calibrated, resulting in operating speeds of 1200 rpm for the Denver cell and 1400 rpm for the Leeds cell. The cells performed similarly at two coarser-sized fractions. However, some deviations were observed in the finer particle size range. The -25 (fine) fraction initially achieved a recovery of only 15%. An additional reagent dosage was required to enhance the recovery of this fraction significantly. These findings highlighted the influence of particle size on flotation recovery. For all experiments, the Denver laboratory flotation cell outperformed (defined by higher recovery) the Leeds device, while still operating at a lower impeller speed. This advantage can be attributed to its impeller-stator design and air dispersion features, effectively overcoming slurry resistance and resulting in superior flotation performance compared to the Leeds cell.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2289/2025
Primary Topic
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Denver and Leeds laboratory flotation cells: Effect of particle size and hydrodynamics

Laurindo de Salles Leal Filho, N. Naudé, M.P. Tshazi
Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
article

Comparison of Denver and Leeds laboratory flotation cells: Effect of particle size and hydrodynamics

Laurindo de Salles Leal Filho, N. Naudé, M.P. Tshazi
article en

Abstract

In this paper, the authors performed experiments in the Denver and Leeds laboratory flotation devices1 at the University of Pretoria at various particle sizes to evaluate the performance of the devices. Quartz was used in a single mineral system at discrete sizes fractions, -25 µm, +2545 µm, +45-75 µm, and +75-106 µm. Hydrodynamic analysis, based on dimensionless power and Reynolds numbers, indicated that the Leeds cell required higher power input to achieve comparable flow conditions. Specifically, the Leeds cell exhibited an average power number of 1.03, whereas the Denver cell averaged 0.77 within the same impeller speed range of 1000 rpm-1500 rpm. For comparative flotation performance, impeller speeds were calibrated, resulting in operating speeds of 1200 rpm for the Denver cell and 1400 rpm for the Leeds cell. The cells performed similarly at two coarser-sized fractions. However, some deviations were observed in the finer particle size range. The -25 (fine) fraction initially achieved a recovery of only 15%. An additional reagent dosage was required to enhance the recovery of this fraction significantly. These findings highlighted the influence of particle size on flotation recovery. For all experiments, the Denver laboratory flotation cell outperformed (defined by higher recovery) the Leeds device, while still operating at a lower impeller speed. This advantage can be attributed to its impeller-stator design and air dispersion features, effectively overcoming slurry resistance and resulting in superior flotation performance compared to the Leeds cell.

Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and MetallurgyVol. 125(5)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of Pretoria (ZA)
University of Pretoria
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.