Functional recovery of tropical forests: The role of restoration methods and environmental conditions

Forest and landscape restoration strategies influence the recovery of plant functional traits, which in turn shape ecosystem processes. To understand how traits respond to restoration and environmental conditions, we assessed the functional recovery of three forest restoration types in Brazil's Atlantic Forest: natural regeneration, high-diversity restoration plantations (20–60 species), and unmanaged tree monocultures. Across 285 plots aged 1–76 years, we quantified seven leaf and stem traits for over 500 species. For each plot, we calculated community mean trait values and three functional diversity indices. The three restoration types showed contrasting successional patterns. Natural regeneration and restoration plantations shifted from acquisitive to conservative resource-use strategies with site age, while monocultures moved in the opposite direction. Restoration plantations exhibited the highest functional richness. Soil conditions (sand content and sum of bases) influenced trait composition and diversity, whereas climate and landscape context had smaller effects. In 20-year old sites, most traits in natural regeneration and restoration plantations approached 90 % of forest remnants values. In contrast, unmanaged monocultures recovered slowly, with only half of the traits reaching this threshold in 40-year old sites. Our findings show that restoration methods and site conditions jointly shape functional recovery. Natural regeneration tends to align with forest remnant traits, restoration plantations speed up early recovery but may diverge over time, and monocultures require active interventions to enhance outcomes. Recognizing these functional trajectories is key to improving biodiversity conservation and ecosystem resilience in tropical forest restoration. • Restoration types showed contrasting successional patterns in resource-use strategies. • Natural regeneration and plantations recover functional traits faster than monocultures. • After 20 years, most traits in natural regeneration and plantations align with forest remnant values • Monocultures recover more slowly, requiring longer to reach functional maturity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111269
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional recovery of tropical forests: The role of restoration methods and environmental conditions

Danilo Roberti Alves de Almeida, Marielos Peña‐Claros, Laura Helena Porcari Simões, Cássio Augusto Patrocínio Toledo et al.
5 citations
Biological Conservation
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
5.53
article

Functional recovery of tropical forests: The role of restoration methods and environmental conditions

Danilo Roberti Alves de Almeida, Marielos Peña‐Claros, Laura Helena Porcari Simões, Cássio Augusto Patrocínio Toledo, José Guedes Fernandes Neto, Paulo Guilherme Molin, Angélica Faria de Resende, Miguel Cooper, Natália Macedo Ivanauskas, Lourens Poorter, Catherine Torres de Almeida, Renato A. Ferreira de Lima, Frans Bongers, Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues, Rens Brouwer, Mathieu Decuyper, Joannès Guillemot, Vinícius Castro Souza, Pedro H. S. Brancalion
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Forest and landscape restoration strategies influence the recovery of plant functional traits, which in turn shape ecosystem processes. To understand how traits respond to restoration and environmental conditions, we assessed the functional recovery of three forest restoration types in Brazil's Atlantic Forest: natural regeneration, high-diversity restoration plantations (20–60 species), and unmanaged tree monocultures. Across 285 plots aged 1–76 years, we quantified seven leaf and stem traits for over 500 species. For each plot, we calculated community mean trait values and three functional diversity indices. The three restoration types showed contrasting successional patterns. Natural regeneration and restoration plantations shifted from acquisitive to conservative resource-use strategies with site age, while monocultures moved in the opposite direction. Restoration plantations exhibited the highest functional richness. Soil conditions (sand content and sum of bases) influenced trait composition and diversity, whereas climate and landscape context had smaller effects. In 20-year old sites, most traits in natural regeneration and restoration plantations approached 90 % of forest remnants values. In contrast, unmanaged monocultures recovered slowly, with only half of the traits reaching this threshold in 40-year old sites. Our findings show that restoration methods and site conditions jointly shape functional recovery. Natural regeneration tends to align with forest remnant traits, restoration plantations speed up early recovery but may diverge over time, and monocultures require active interventions to enhance outcomes. Recognizing these functional trajectories is key to improving biodiversity conservation and ecosystem resilience in tropical forest restoration. • Restoration types showed contrasting successional patterns in resource-use strategies. • Natural regeneration and plantations recover functional traits faster than monocultures. • After 20 years, most traits in natural regeneration and plantations align with forest remnant values • Monocultures recover more slowly, requiring longer to reach functional maturity.

Biological ConservationVol. 309
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Institut Agro Montpellier (FR), Instituto Adolfo Lutz (BR), Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences (NL), Ecologie fonctionnelle & biogéochimie des sols & des agro-systèmes (FR), Red, Orange and Green Environmental Technologies (Brazil) (BR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, AES Brasil
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.