Effect of AI‐Based Learning on Students' Computational Thinking Development: Evidence From a Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT AI‐based learning (AIBL) is becoming more and more popular. Is it effective for the development of students' computational thinking (CT)? This meta‐analysis explores the effects of AIBL on students' CT development based on 26 high‐quality experimental articles. The results suggest that AIBL has an upper‐medium positive effect on students' CT development (Hedges's g = 0.553, 95% CI [0.410, 0.708], z = 7.366, p < 0.001), indicating that AIBL can effectively promote students' CT development. Moreover, moderator analyses reveal that AIBL is more effective under the following conditions: (1) for AI intervention type that applies AI algorithms; (2) in earlier publication years. (3) among European students; (4) among senior secondary students; (5) with sample sizes between 30 and 50 students; (6) for interventions lasting more than 2 months or less than 1 week; (7) in traditional programming courses; (8) when using project‐based design; (9) for individual learning; (10) when assessed by test‐based measurement tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70058
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of AI‐Based Learning on Students' Computational Thinking Development: Evidence From a Meta‐Analysis

Gexing Cheng, De-Xin Hu
1 citations
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Teaching and Learning Programming
1.69
article

Effect of AI‐Based Learning on Students' Computational Thinking Development: Evidence From a Meta‐Analysis

Gexing Cheng, De-Xin Hu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT AI‐based learning (AIBL) is becoming more and more popular. Is it effective for the development of students' computational thinking (CT)? This meta‐analysis explores the effects of AIBL on students' CT development based on 26 high‐quality experimental articles. The results suggest that AIBL has an upper‐medium positive effect on students' CT development (Hedges's g = 0.553, 95% CI [0.410, 0.708], z = 7.366, p < 0.001), indicating that AIBL can effectively promote students' CT development. Moreover, moderator analyses reveal that AIBL is more effective under the following conditions: (1) for AI intervention type that applies AI algorithms; (2) in earlier publication years. (3) among European students; (4) among senior secondary students; (5) with sample sizes between 30 and 50 students; (6) for interventions lasting more than 2 months or less than 1 week; (7) in traditional programming courses; (8) when using project‐based design; (9) for individual learning; (10) when assessed by test‐based measurement tools.

Computer Applications in Engineering EducationVol. 33(4)
Tianjin University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Teaching and Learning Programming
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of AI‐Based Learning on Students' Computational Thinking Development: Evidence From a Meta‐Analysis — Gexing Cheng, De-Xin Hu · Computer Applications in Engineering Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS