‘Crossing the Rubicon’: Explaining Sweden’s decision to join NATO

In May 2022, Sweden took the historic decision to apply for NATO membership, thereby ending two-hundred years of neutrality and military non-alignment. How can we explain such a dramatic change in Swedish foreign policy? Although Russia’s invasion of Ukraine constitutes a critical juncture for Sweden and Europe, Swedish neutrality and non-alignment has survived other eruptions of major interstate war in Europe. In this article, we argue the Swedish decision to join NATO represented the ‘tipping point’ of a long and incremental process of change in Swedish security policy. Our analysis utilises a neoclassical realist framework which focuses on examining interlinkages between systemic change and unit-level factors. We conclude that in the case of Sweden, exogenous systemic pressures created a critical juncture, but policy change was only possible because of far-reaching transformations of Swedish foreign policy role conceptions and strategic culture, along with the critical role played by policy entrepreneurs in crisis decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481251341683
Citations
4
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Crossing the Rubicon’: Explaining Sweden’s decision to join NATO

Lisbeth Aggestam, Adrian Hyde‐Price
4 citations
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
International Relations and Foreign Policy
34.09
article

‘Crossing the Rubicon’: Explaining Sweden’s decision to join NATO

Lisbeth Aggestam, Adrian Hyde‐Price
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In May 2022, Sweden took the historic decision to apply for NATO membership, thereby ending two-hundred years of neutrality and military non-alignment. How can we explain such a dramatic change in Swedish foreign policy? Although Russia’s invasion of Ukraine constitutes a critical juncture for Sweden and Europe, Swedish neutrality and non-alignment has survived other eruptions of major interstate war in Europe. In this article, we argue the Swedish decision to join NATO represented the ‘tipping point’ of a long and incremental process of change in Swedish security policy. Our analysis utilises a neoclassical realist framework which focuses on examining interlinkages between systemic change and unit-level factors. We conclude that in the case of Sweden, exogenous systemic pressures created a critical juncture, but policy change was only possible because of far-reaching transformations of Swedish foreign policy role conceptions and strategic culture, along with the critical role played by policy entrepreneurs in crisis decision-making.

The British Journal of Politics and International RelationsVol. 27(4)
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.