Dynamic Responses of Embankment Resting on Liquefiable Foundation Soil under Pulse- and Nonpulse-Type Ground Motions

This study examines the fragility response of an earthen embankment supported on a liquefiable deposit subjected to pulse and nonpulse ground motions. Fragility curves are developed based on two key parameters, namely, median seismic intensity and overall variability in the analysis. Such curves represent the vulnerability of an earthen embankment under two distinct types of ground motions. Numerical simulations are performed using two-dimensional finite-element analysis under plane strain conditions. The saturated sandy deposits in the foundation are modeled with the UBC3D-PLM constitutive model and calibrated with appropriate parameters. Two damage indexes are introduced: normalized embankment settlement and lateral embankment deformation. Nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis is performed for various ground motions, and fragility parameters are developed for different damage levels. The results show that pulse-type earthquakes cause more serious damage to earthen structures than nonpulse-type earthquakes, increasing the vulnerability. Further, the liquefiable layer thickness in the foundation soil plays a significant role in the vulnerability assessment of the embankment. The foundation liquefiable layer with less thickness may lead to an early onset of damage and lower the seismic demand on the embankment structure at lower damage levels. With an increase in the layer thickness, seismic demand reduces, with the drainage path playing a critical role.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geomechanics
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-11437
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Responses of Embankment Resting on Liquefiable Foundation Soil under Pulse- and Nonpulse-Type Ground Motions

Priyanka Ghosh, Abhijit Chakraborty
International Journal of Geomechanics
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Dynamic Responses of Embankment Resting on Liquefiable Foundation Soil under Pulse- and Nonpulse-Type Ground Motions

Priyanka Ghosh, Abhijit Chakraborty
article en

Abstract

This study examines the fragility response of an earthen embankment supported on a liquefiable deposit subjected to pulse and nonpulse ground motions. Fragility curves are developed based on two key parameters, namely, median seismic intensity and overall variability in the analysis. Such curves represent the vulnerability of an earthen embankment under two distinct types of ground motions. Numerical simulations are performed using two-dimensional finite-element analysis under plane strain conditions. The saturated sandy deposits in the foundation are modeled with the UBC3D-PLM constitutive model and calibrated with appropriate parameters. Two damage indexes are introduced: normalized embankment settlement and lateral embankment deformation. Nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis is performed for various ground motions, and fragility parameters are developed for different damage levels. The results show that pulse-type earthquakes cause more serious damage to earthen structures than nonpulse-type earthquakes, increasing the vulnerability. Further, the liquefiable layer thickness in the foundation soil plays a significant role in the vulnerability assessment of the embankment. The foundation liquefiable layer with less thickness may lead to an early onset of damage and lower the seismic demand on the embankment structure at lower damage levels. With an increase in the layer thickness, seismic demand reduces, with the drainage path playing a critical role.

International Journal of GeomechanicsVol. 25(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.