Cannabigerol Extraction from a Cannabis Cultivar Using a Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Process

Abstract To attempt a selective extraction from a cannabigerol (CBG)‐rich Cannabis cultivar, supercritical fluid extraction was tried, operating at 18 MPa and 40 °C. In the first set of experiments, a fractional extraction scheme was used to favor the separation between the cannabinoid extract and paraffinic waxes: global and CBG yields were equal to 4.8 % and 3.8 % w/w, respectively, leading to an overall CBG concentration in the extract up to 79 %. However, GC–MS traces showed that CBG also tended to precipitate in the refrigerated separator together with paraffinic waxes, due to CBG steric configuration that is very similar to the one of paraffins. Therefore, non‐fractional extraction experiments were selected, by‐passing the refrigerated separator. Operating in this manner, a selective extraction was obtained with improved global and CBG yields up to 5.3 % and 4.4 % w/w, respectively, and a CBG concentration of 83 % in the extract.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.70052
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cannabigerol Extraction from a Cannabis Cultivar Using a Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Process

Ernesto Reverchon, Lucia Baldino, Mariarosa Scognamiglio, Alessandra Zanotti
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Cannabigerol Extraction from a Cannabis Cultivar Using a Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Process

Ernesto Reverchon, Lucia Baldino, Mariarosa Scognamiglio, Alessandra Zanotti
article en

Abstract

Abstract To attempt a selective extraction from a cannabigerol (CBG)‐rich Cannabis cultivar, supercritical fluid extraction was tried, operating at 18 MPa and 40 °C. In the first set of experiments, a fractional extraction scheme was used to favor the separation between the cannabinoid extract and paraffinic waxes: global and CBG yields were equal to 4.8 % and 3.8 % w/w, respectively, leading to an overall CBG concentration in the extract up to 79 %. However, GC–MS traces showed that CBG also tended to precipitate in the refrigerated separator together with paraffinic waxes, due to CBG steric configuration that is very similar to the one of paraffins. Therefore, non‐fractional extraction experiments were selected, by‐passing the refrigerated separator. Operating in this manner, a selective extraction was obtained with improved global and CBG yields up to 5.3 % and 4.4 % w/w, respectively, and a CBG concentration of 83 % in the extract.

Chemical Engineering & TechnologyVol. 48(7)
University of Salerno (IT)
Università degli Studi di Salerno
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.