Evaluation of the Common Needs and Preferences of Different Generations in Mixed-Age Community Public Spaces Based on the IPA-Kano Model

This study adopts an intergenerational perspective, categorizing users of community public spaces into three distinct age groups—children, young and middle-aged adults, and the elderly—to construct a needs-oriented evaluation framework. Utilizing the IPA-Kano model, we conducted a comparative analysis, integrating satisfaction levels to identify and rank factors requiring enhancement as perceived by each age group within various communities. Key findings highlight common priorities across age groups, including systematic trash bin placement, enhancement of barrier-free facilities, improvement of night lighting, and the installation of security monitoring facilities. Infrastructure and amenities analysis revealed needs for improved water feature landscapes and recreation facilities, with a particular interest from children, and the provision of more fitness facilities to cater to a broad range of users. Recommendations include systematic waste management, inclusive design for accessibility, enhanced lighting and surveillance, maintenance of water features, increased seating, and prioritization of adult fitness facilities. Emphasis is also placed on community cultural activities for the elderly to foster a sense of community and support sustainable development. The study’s findings and recommendations aim to address the diverse needs of different age groups within communities, promoting a more inclusive, safe, and enjoyable living environment for all residents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251340130
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Korean Urban and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Common Needs and Preferences of Different Generations in Mixed-Age Community Public Spaces Based on the IPA-Kano Model

Y. L. Lu
1 citations
SAGE Open
Korean Urban and Social Studies
2.42
article

Evaluation of the Common Needs and Preferences of Different Generations in Mixed-Age Community Public Spaces Based on the IPA-Kano Model

Y. L. Lu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study adopts an intergenerational perspective, categorizing users of community public spaces into three distinct age groups—children, young and middle-aged adults, and the elderly—to construct a needs-oriented evaluation framework. Utilizing the IPA-Kano model, we conducted a comparative analysis, integrating satisfaction levels to identify and rank factors requiring enhancement as perceived by each age group within various communities. Key findings highlight common priorities across age groups, including systematic trash bin placement, enhancement of barrier-free facilities, improvement of night lighting, and the installation of security monitoring facilities. Infrastructure and amenities analysis revealed needs for improved water feature landscapes and recreation facilities, with a particular interest from children, and the provision of more fitness facilities to cater to a broad range of users. Recommendations include systematic waste management, inclusive design for accessibility, enhanced lighting and surveillance, maintenance of water features, increased seating, and prioritization of adult fitness facilities. Emphasis is also placed on community cultural activities for the elderly to foster a sense of community and support sustainable development. The study’s findings and recommendations aim to address the diverse needs of different age groups within communities, promoting a more inclusive, safe, and enjoyable living environment for all residents.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(2)
Nanjing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Korean Urban and Social Studies
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.