Allocation of liability for driverless cars: Based on legal economics

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, driverless cars are gradually moving from laboratory technology to market application. This technological revolution not only brings convenience and efficiency enhancement to the society, but also accompanies the legal difficulties of accident liability allocation. The traditional traffic accident liability allocation model is based on the driver's fault to divide the responsibility, but in the driverless scenario, the autonomous decision-making and behavior of the vehicle weakens or even completely replaces the role of the driver, which makes the existing legal framework face significant challenges in dealing with the problem of accident liability attribution. In this paper, we propose an “optimal mechanism” for assigning liability to driverless cars from the perspective of legal economics, with a view to seeking a dynamic balance between technological risks and legal norms. By analyzing the efficiency of liability attribution rules, this paper attempts to provide legal support for the development of driverless technology and institutional guarantee for the fair distribution of accident liability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v2i6.435
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allocation of liability for driverless cars: Based on legal economics

Decai He
International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Allocation of liability for driverless cars: Based on legal economics

Decai He
article en

Abstract

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, driverless cars are gradually moving from laboratory technology to market application. This technological revolution not only brings convenience and efficiency enhancement to the society, but also accompanies the legal difficulties of accident liability allocation. The traditional traffic accident liability allocation model is based on the driver's fault to divide the responsibility, but in the driverless scenario, the autonomous decision-making and behavior of the vehicle weakens or even completely replaces the role of the driver, which makes the existing legal framework face significant challenges in dealing with the problem of accident liability attribution. In this paper, we propose an “optimal mechanism” for assigning liability to driverless cars from the perspective of legal economics, with a view to seeking a dynamic balance between technological risks and legal norms. By analyzing the efficiency of liability attribution rules, this paper attempts to provide legal support for the development of driverless technology and institutional guarantee for the fair distribution of accident liability.

International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 2(6)
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Allocation of liability for driverless cars: Based on legal economics — Decai He · International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS