Is the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank's assistance to Shanghai Cooperation Organisation(SCO) member states revisionist and status quo?

This paper examines whether China’s assistance to Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) member states through the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) reflects a revisionist strategy that seeks to reshape the international order or a status quo approach that reinforces the existing global system. By applying international relations theories of revisionism and status quo, and analyzing AIIB-financed infrastructure projects in Uzbekistan, the study finds that China’s approach exhibits dual characteristics. On the one hand, China uses the AIIB to enhance its influence in global financial governance, thereby challenging the dominance of Western-led institutions such as the World Bank. On the other hand, China engages in multilateral cooperation and adheres to international norms in project implementation, suggesting a status quo orientation. The paper argues that China’s global strategy through the AIIB is flexible and multifaceted, reflecting a complex posture in the evolving landscape of global governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v2i6.1046
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank's assistance to Shanghai Cooperation Organisation(SCO) member states revisionist and status quo?

Xiao-jun XIE
International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences
International Development and Aid
article

Is the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank's assistance to Shanghai Cooperation Organisation(SCO) member states revisionist and status quo?

Xiao-jun XIE
article en

Abstract

This paper examines whether China’s assistance to Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) member states through the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) reflects a revisionist strategy that seeks to reshape the international order or a status quo approach that reinforces the existing global system. By applying international relations theories of revisionism and status quo, and analyzing AIIB-financed infrastructure projects in Uzbekistan, the study finds that China’s approach exhibits dual characteristics. On the one hand, China uses the AIIB to enhance its influence in global financial governance, thereby challenging the dominance of Western-led institutions such as the World Bank. On the other hand, China engages in multilateral cooperation and adheres to international norms in project implementation, suggesting a status quo orientation. The paper argues that China’s global strategy through the AIIB is flexible and multifaceted, reflecting a complex posture in the evolving landscape of global governance.

International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 2(6)
Huaihua University (CN), Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.