For you vs. for everyone: The effectiveness of algorithmic personalization in driving social media engagement

• This study investigated the effects of algorithmic personalization on social media. • After a baseline week, 88 TikTok users switched to a less personalized feed for one week. • During the less personalized week, daily frequency and duration of TikTok use decreased. • TikTok use was perceived as more controlled, yet less enjoyable. Social media platforms increasingly use algorithmic personalization, raising concerns about potential uncontrolled usage. However, these concerns remain partly speculative as evidence for the effectiveness of algorithmic personalization in driving user engagement is limited. Therefore, the present study investigated how TikTok users’ behavior and experiences would change if their feeds were no longer personalized based on their interests. In this preregistered study, 88 TikTok users participated in a two-week within-subjects design: a baseline week (default highly personalized feed), followed by an experimental week (less personalized feed). Daily experiences were assessed through daily surveys, and objective TikTok usage data was obtained through screenshots. We found that both daily frequency and duration of TikTok use decreased, self-regulation increased, and participants derived less enjoyment from their use. These findings highlight the critical role of algorithmic personalization in sustaining user engagement and suggest that reducing feed personalization may be a promising, though currently limited, approach to address uncontrolled social media use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Telematics and Informatics
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2025.102300
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

For you vs. for everyone: The effectiveness of algorithmic personalization in driving social media engagement

Susanne E. Baumgartner, Sindy R. Sumter, C. Dekker
8 citations
Telematics and Informatics
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
33.61
article

For you vs. for everyone: The effectiveness of algorithmic personalization in driving social media engagement

Susanne E. Baumgartner, Sindy R. Sumter, C. Dekker
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• This study investigated the effects of algorithmic personalization on social media. • After a baseline week, 88 TikTok users switched to a less personalized feed for one week. • During the less personalized week, daily frequency and duration of TikTok use decreased. • TikTok use was perceived as more controlled, yet less enjoyable. Social media platforms increasingly use algorithmic personalization, raising concerns about potential uncontrolled usage. However, these concerns remain partly speculative as evidence for the effectiveness of algorithmic personalization in driving user engagement is limited. Therefore, the present study investigated how TikTok users’ behavior and experiences would change if their feeds were no longer personalized based on their interests. In this preregistered study, 88 TikTok users participated in a two-week within-subjects design: a baseline week (default highly personalized feed), followed by an experimental week (less personalized feed). Daily experiences were assessed through daily surveys, and objective TikTok usage data was obtained through screenshots. We found that both daily frequency and duration of TikTok use decreased, self-regulation increased, and participants derived less enjoyment from their use. These findings highlight the critical role of algorithmic personalization in sustaining user engagement and suggest that reducing feed personalization may be a promising, though currently limited, approach to address uncontrolled social media use.

Telematics and InformaticsVol. 101
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
33.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.