Flourishing in South Africa: Benchmarks and sociodemographic variation across 69 health, wellbeing, and related factors in the Global Flourishing Study

Using nationally representative data for South Africa (N = 2,651) from Wave 1 of the Global Flourishing Study, we explored the distributions of 69 health, wellbeing, and related factors and tested for potential sociodemographic differences in the means/proportions of those indicators. When comparing estimates for South Africa with pooled estimates for the combined set of 22 countries included in the Global Flourishing Study, we did not find definitive evidence of differences on most of the main health and wellbeing outcomes. On the few main outcomes where we observed differences, estimates for some were more favorable in South Africa (e.g., peace, suffering) while others were less favorable (e.g., life satisfaction, trust). South Africa was more distinguishable from the entire set of 22 countries on the outcomes within the supplementary domains of socioeconomic factors and religion/spirituality, with lower estimates found for South Africa on several socioeconomic factors and higher estimates observed for almost all religion/spirituality indicators. Our exploration of sociodemographic variation in the outcomes suggested that some subpopulations might be flourishing to a greater degree than others (e.g., those aged 80 years or older, males), but the pattern of sociodemographic differences across the outcomes was somewhat mixed and the flourishing profile of subpopulations varied quite considerably. These findings offer important insights for South African policymakers and public health practitioners on the need to support vulnerable subpopulations (e.g., females, those who are divorced), as well as lay the foundation for population-level monitoring of flourishing in South Africa using future Global Flourishing Study panel data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Wellbeing
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v15i3.5237
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flourishing in South Africa: Benchmarks and sociodemographic variation across 69 health, wellbeing, and related factors in the Global Flourishing Study

Kaymarlin Govender, Byron R. Johnson, Tyler J. VanderWeele, Ying Chen et al.
3 citations
International Journal of Wellbeing
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
7.32
article

Flourishing in South Africa: Benchmarks and sociodemographic variation across 69 health, wellbeing, and related factors in the Global Flourishing Study

Kaymarlin Govender, Byron R. Johnson, Tyler J. VanderWeele, Ying Chen, R. Noah Padgett, Angelina Wilson Fadiji, Brendan Case, Richard Gregory Cowden, Tim Lomas, W.J. Schoeman, Hans J. Hendriks
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Using nationally representative data for South Africa (N = 2,651) from Wave 1 of the Global Flourishing Study, we explored the distributions of 69 health, wellbeing, and related factors and tested for potential sociodemographic differences in the means/proportions of those indicators. When comparing estimates for South Africa with pooled estimates for the combined set of 22 countries included in the Global Flourishing Study, we did not find definitive evidence of differences on most of the main health and wellbeing outcomes. On the few main outcomes where we observed differences, estimates for some were more favorable in South Africa (e.g., peace, suffering) while others were less favorable (e.g., life satisfaction, trust). South Africa was more distinguishable from the entire set of 22 countries on the outcomes within the supplementary domains of socioeconomic factors and religion/spirituality, with lower estimates found for South Africa on several socioeconomic factors and higher estimates observed for almost all religion/spirituality indicators. Our exploration of sociodemographic variation in the outcomes suggested that some subpopulations might be flourishing to a greater degree than others (e.g., those aged 80 years or older, males), but the pattern of sociodemographic differences across the outcomes was somewhat mixed and the flourishing profile of subpopulations varied quite considerably. These findings offer important insights for South African policymakers and public health practitioners on the need to support vulnerable subpopulations (e.g., females, those who are divorced), as well as lay the foundation for population-level monitoring of flourishing in South Africa using future Global Flourishing Study panel data.

International Journal of WellbeingVol. 15(3)
Harvard University Press (US)
John Templeton Foundation, Fetzer Institute, Baylor University, Templeton World Charity Foundation, Templeton Religion Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.