Adaptability of Islamic Jurisprudence in Hajj: Comparative Study of Four Madhhabs in Technological Era

This study aims to examine how Islamic jurisprudence, particularly the four major Sunni schools (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali), adapts to contemporary transformations in Hajj practices. It explores the extent to which traditional rulings evolve in response to technological innovations, health protocols, and gender-related developments, especially the participation of women without a mahram. Employing a qualitative-comparative approach, this research analyzes classical fiqh texts alongside contemporary fatwas, official guidelines, and academic commentaries. Through the lens of ijtihad and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, the study critically assesses scholarly interpretations on issues such as electronic identification, mobile applications, surveillance systems, health measures, and modern transportation. Findings reveal that all four Sunni schools demonstrate varying degrees of flexibility in accommodating modern realities. While the Hanafi school maintains traditional restrictions in certain areas, the Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali schools generally permit adaptations that prioritize safety, public interest, and ease of religious observance. Jurists increasingly accept the use of technology and revised travel norms, including the allowance for women to perform Hajj without a mahram under safe conditions. This research offers a comprehensive comparative analysis that integrates classical jurisprudence with modern contextual needs. It contributes to the growing discourse on how Islamic law remains relevant by evolving within the framework of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, particularly in a globalized and technologically advanced society. The study underscores the importance of dynamic legal reasoning in preserving both the sanctity and accessibility of Hajj. It supports the legitimacy of using ijtihad and contextual interpretation in contemporary Islamic legal thought, providing guidance for religious authorities, policymakers, and Muslim communities navigating modern pilgrimage challenges

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v25i1.56627
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptability of Islamic Jurisprudence in Hajj: Comparative Study of Four Madhhabs in Technological Era

Abdillah Abdillah
Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Adaptability of Islamic Jurisprudence in Hajj: Comparative Study of Four Madhhabs in Technological Era

Abdillah Abdillah
article en

Abstract

This study aims to examine how Islamic jurisprudence, particularly the four major Sunni schools (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali), adapts to contemporary transformations in Hajj practices. It explores the extent to which traditional rulings evolve in response to technological innovations, health protocols, and gender-related developments, especially the participation of women without a mahram. Employing a qualitative-comparative approach, this research analyzes classical fiqh texts alongside contemporary fatwas, official guidelines, and academic commentaries. Through the lens of ijtihad and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, the study critically assesses scholarly interpretations on issues such as electronic identification, mobile applications, surveillance systems, health measures, and modern transportation. Findings reveal that all four Sunni schools demonstrate varying degrees of flexibility in accommodating modern realities. While the Hanafi school maintains traditional restrictions in certain areas, the Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali schools generally permit adaptations that prioritize safety, public interest, and ease of religious observance. Jurists increasingly accept the use of technology and revised travel norms, including the allowance for women to perform Hajj without a mahram under safe conditions. This research offers a comprehensive comparative analysis that integrates classical jurisprudence with modern contextual needs. It contributes to the growing discourse on how Islamic law remains relevant by evolving within the framework of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, particularly in a globalized and technologically advanced society. The study underscores the importance of dynamic legal reasoning in preserving both the sanctity and accessibility of Hajj. It supports the legitimacy of using ijtihad and contextual interpretation in contemporary Islamic legal thought, providing guidance for religious authorities, policymakers, and Muslim communities navigating modern pilgrimage challenges

Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan HukumVol. 25(1)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare (ID), Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.