Experiences of Censorship on TikTok Across Marginalised Identities

TikTok has seen exponential growth as a platform, fuelled by the success of its proprietary recommender algorithm which serves tailored content to every user - though not without controversy. Users complain of their content being unfairly suppressed by "the algorithm", particularly users with marginalised identities such as LGBTQ+ users. Together with content removal, this suppression acts to censor what is shared on the platform. Journalists have revealed biases in automatic censorship, as well as human moderation. We investigate experiences of censorship on TikTok, across users marginalised by their gender, LGBTQ+ identity, disability or ethnicity. We survey 627 UK-based TikTok users and find that marginalised users often feel they are subject to censorship for content that does not violate community guidelines. We highlight many avenues for future research into censorship on TikTok, with a focus on users' folk theories, which greatly shape their experiences of the platform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35912
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of Censorship on TikTok Across Marginalised Identities

Björn Roß, Eddie L. Ungless, Nina Markl
2 citations
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
Islamic Finance and Communication
8.40
article

Experiences of Censorship on TikTok Across Marginalised Identities

Björn Roß, Eddie L. Ungless, Nina Markl
article en
2 citations

Abstract

TikTok has seen exponential growth as a platform, fuelled by the success of its proprietary recommender algorithm which serves tailored content to every user - though not without controversy. Users complain of their content being unfairly suppressed by "the algorithm", particularly users with marginalised identities such as LGBTQ+ users. Together with content removal, this suppression acts to censor what is shared on the platform. Journalists have revealed biases in automatic censorship, as well as human moderation. We investigate experiences of censorship on TikTok, across users marginalised by their gender, LGBTQ+ identity, disability or ethnicity. We survey 627 UK-based TikTok users and find that marginalised users often feel they are subject to censorship for content that does not violate community guidelines. We highlight many avenues for future research into censorship on TikTok, with a focus on users' folk theories, which greatly shape their experiences of the platform.

Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social MediaVol. 19
University of Essex (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
UK Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Islamic Finance and Communication
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.