Crisis, Continuity, and Change: A Case Study of a Local Prosecutor’s Office Under COVID-19 and its Implications for Reform

Abstract Sudden crises can challenge routine work assumptions, values, and practices, and allow more fundamental organizational changes to emerge. We conducted thirty-five semi-structured interviews with local prosecutors and their staff in a jurisdiction in the United States and identified the changes they experienced due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including how they made sense of these changes. Our findings suggest that prosecutors’ traditional conceptions of their role and purpose help explain why initial changes to increased telework and virtual court appearances, charge reductions, limits to pre-trial detention, and more lenient plea offers, did not seem to have endured post-pandemic. More generally, our study highlights some obstacles to prosecutorial reforms that try to create a less adversarial and punitive criminal legal system. Based on prosecutors’ experiences, we conclude with some policy implications that could contribute to more comprehensive changes in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Criminal Justice
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-025-09819-6
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis, Continuity, and Change: A Case Study of a Local Prosecutor’s Office Under COVID-19 and its Implications for Reform

Marthinus C. Koen, James J. Willis, Gabrielle Roubanian
American Journal of Criminal Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Crisis, Continuity, and Change: A Case Study of a Local Prosecutor’s Office Under COVID-19 and its Implications for Reform

Marthinus C. Koen, James J. Willis, Gabrielle Roubanian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sudden crises can challenge routine work assumptions, values, and practices, and allow more fundamental organizational changes to emerge. We conducted thirty-five semi-structured interviews with local prosecutors and their staff in a jurisdiction in the United States and identified the changes they experienced due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including how they made sense of these changes. Our findings suggest that prosecutors’ traditional conceptions of their role and purpose help explain why initial changes to increased telework and virtual court appearances, charge reductions, limits to pre-trial detention, and more lenient plea offers, did not seem to have endured post-pandemic. More generally, our study highlights some obstacles to prosecutorial reforms that try to create a less adversarial and punitive criminal legal system. Based on prosecutors’ experiences, we conclude with some policy implications that could contribute to more comprehensive changes in the future.

American Journal of Criminal JusticeVol. 50(6)
Southeast Missouri State University (US), George Mason University (US), State University of New York at Oswego (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.