Cohort Profile: the Work Environment and Health in Denmark study

Why was the cohort set up?Conditions at the workplace, including physical, chemical, biological, and psychosocial exposures, are important determinants of population health [1][2][3].Considering the ethical and practical constraints of conducting randomized controlled trials on potentially hazardous work conditions, and the limitations of cross-sectional and case-control studies regarding causal interpretations, cohort studies are essential for elucidating the relationships between working conditions and health outcomes.Examples for occupational cohort studies with specific job groups and industries are the British Whitehall II study (civil servants) [4], the French GAZEL study (employees with civil servant-like status in an utility firm) [5], the Finnish Public Key Features The Work Environment and Health in Denmark (WEHD) study was established to monitor employees' work environment and health and to analyse the association between working conditions and health.The nationwide scope and comprehensive linkage to national registries are unique, allowing long-term follow-up with minimal attrition. Survey data of employees in Denmark were collected biennially from 2012 to 2018 with continuous follow-up in national registries, yielding three cohorts, with responders 18-64 years old and 53% women: i) N 88 076 responding to at least one survey and followed up in registries;ii) N 15 852 responding in 2012 and followed up in subsequent waves (2014, 2016, 2018, responders to all four waves: N5933, 37.4%) and registries; iii) N 30 070 responding in either 2012 or 2016 and invited to survey follow-up 2 years later (2014 and 2018, respectively, responders: N 22 445, 74.7%) and followed up in registries. The surveys collected data on physical, chemical, biological, and psychosocial working conditions, and self-reported health.The registries provided sociodemographic, labour market, and health data for responders and responders' cohabiting partners, children, and parents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaf085
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cohort Profile: the Work Environment and Health in Denmark study

Jacob Pedersen, Ida E H Madsen, Jeppe Karl Sørensen, Hans Bay et al.
5 citations
International Journal of Epidemiology
Workplace Health and Well-being
14.08
article

Cohort Profile: the Work Environment and Health in Denmark study

Jacob Pedersen, Ida E H Madsen, Jeppe Karl Sørensen, Hans Bay, Lars L. Andersen, Louise Dalsager, Vivi Schlünssen, Anne Helene Garde, Reiner Rugulies, Nina Føns Johnsen, Nanna Larsson, Kathrine Sørensen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Why was the cohort set up?Conditions at the workplace, including physical, chemical, biological, and psychosocial exposures, are important determinants of population health [1][2][3].Considering the ethical and practical constraints of conducting randomized controlled trials on potentially hazardous work conditions, and the limitations of cross-sectional and case-control studies regarding causal interpretations, cohort studies are essential for elucidating the relationships between working conditions and health outcomes.Examples for occupational cohort studies with specific job groups and industries are the British Whitehall II study (civil servants) [4], the French GAZEL study (employees with civil servant-like status in an utility firm) [5], the Finnish Public Key Features The Work Environment and Health in Denmark (WEHD) study was established to monitor employees' work environment and health and to analyse the association between working conditions and health.The nationwide scope and comprehensive linkage to national registries are unique, allowing long-term follow-up with minimal attrition. Survey data of employees in Denmark were collected biennially from 2012 to 2018 with continuous follow-up in national registries, yielding three cohorts, with responders 18-64 years old and 53% women: i) N 88 076 responding to at least one survey and followed up in registries;ii) N 15 852 responding in 2012 and followed up in subsequent waves (2014, 2016, 2018, responders to all four waves: N5933, 37.4%) and registries; iii) N 30 070 responding in either 2012 or 2016 and invited to survey follow-up 2 years later (2014 and 2018, respectively, responders: N 22 445, 74.7%) and followed up in registries. The surveys collected data on physical, chemical, biological, and psychosocial working conditions, and self-reported health.The registries provided sociodemographic, labour market, and health data for responders and responders' cohabiting partners, children, and parents.

International Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 54(3)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Danish Ramazzini Center (DK), National Research Centre for the Working Environment (DK), Capital Region of Denmark (DK), Danish Working Environment Authority (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
National Research Centre, Arbejdstilsynet
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Workplace Health and Well-being
14.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.