Do technological innovations in working conditions influence consumer preferences for chicken meat?

This study examines how information about the introduction of innovative technologies that improve working conditions influences consumers' perceptions and preferences for chicken breast. The study uses a discrete choice experiment to investigate the preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) of 663 Italian respondents who were presented with an online questionnaire. To assess the impact of innovation on brand equity, the sample was randomly divided into two groups: the treatment group (T), which received information on the impact of the application of the solutions provided in the innovation plan on employee well-being, and the control group (C), which received no information. The results show that consumers perceive the innovation positively, but the effect on brand equity is not significant. In addition, consumers prefer a lower priced product and the organic option is strongly preferred over all other production methods. Finally, information about technological innovation does not influence consumers' purchase intentions. • Consumers prefer organic chicken over other production methods, indicating a strong demand for sustainable products. • Brand equity significantly influences consumer choice, with brand1 being the most preferred due to regional familiarity. • Price remains a major factor in purchasing decisions, with low-cost products being preferred. • Information about technological innovations has no significant influence on consumer preferences or WTP. • The segmentation of consumers reveals different groups, which highlights the need for targeted marketing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102077
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do technological innovations in working conditions influence consumer preferences for chicken meat?

Giulia Maesano, Maurizio Canavari, Vilma Xhakollari
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Do technological innovations in working conditions influence consumer preferences for chicken meat?

Giulia Maesano, Maurizio Canavari, Vilma Xhakollari
article en

Abstract

This study examines how information about the introduction of innovative technologies that improve working conditions influences consumers' perceptions and preferences for chicken breast. The study uses a discrete choice experiment to investigate the preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) of 663 Italian respondents who were presented with an online questionnaire. To assess the impact of innovation on brand equity, the sample was randomly divided into two groups: the treatment group (T), which received information on the impact of the application of the solutions provided in the innovation plan on employee well-being, and the control group (C), which received no information. The results show that consumers perceive the innovation positively, but the effect on brand equity is not significant. In addition, consumers prefer a lower priced product and the organic option is strongly preferred over all other production methods. Finally, information about technological innovation does not influence consumers' purchase intentions. • Consumers prefer organic chicken over other production methods, indicating a strong demand for sustainable products. • Brand equity significantly influences consumer choice, with brand1 being the most preferred due to regional familiarity. • Price remains a major factor in purchasing decisions, with low-cost products being preferred. • Information about technological innovations has no significant influence on consumer preferences or WTP. • The segmentation of consumers reveals different groups, which highlights the need for targeted marketing strategies.

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 22
University of Reading (GB), University of Bologna (IT)
European Commission
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.