When opaque firms borrow: The role of investor sentiment

We examine the effect of firm opacity on debt growth and how investor sentiment shapes this relationship. Using an international sample of firms during 2005–2019, we find that firm opacity negatively influences the growth in both bank and total debt ratios. This relationship is more relevant during periods of high investor sentiment. The role of investor sentiment is more prominent for firms with a lower proportion of bank ownership. The joint effect of firm opacity and investor sentiment is more relevant in countries with more developed institutions and greater creditor rights protection. Our results hold after addressing potential endogeneity concerns and additional tests. • Positive relationship between corporate opacity and debt growth • Stronger effect observed in bank debt compared to total debt • Banks' selectivity in high market optimism • Strong institutions and creditor protections shape opacity-debt dynamics

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Financial Analysis
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104410
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When opaque firms borrow: The role of investor sentiment

Elena Ferrer, Nuria Suárez
2 citations
International Review of Financial Analysis
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
article

When opaque firms borrow: The role of investor sentiment

Elena Ferrer, Nuria Suárez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We examine the effect of firm opacity on debt growth and how investor sentiment shapes this relationship. Using an international sample of firms during 2005–2019, we find that firm opacity negatively influences the growth in both bank and total debt ratios. This relationship is more relevant during periods of high investor sentiment. The role of investor sentiment is more prominent for firms with a lower proportion of bank ownership. The joint effect of firm opacity and investor sentiment is more relevant in countries with more developed institutions and greater creditor rights protection. Our results hold after addressing potential endogeneity concerns and additional tests. • Positive relationship between corporate opacity and debt growth • Stronger effect observed in bank debt compared to total debt • Banks' selectivity in high market optimism • Strong institutions and creditor protections shape opacity-debt dynamics

International Review of Financial AnalysisVol. 105
Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.