Enhanced sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) retrieval from Antarctic diatoms

Diatom microfossils are key environmental indicators and an important proxy in paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Sedimentary ancient DNA ( sed aDNA) complements microfossil analysis by detecting poorly preserved diatoms and distinguishing morphologically similar taxa, painting a more detailed picture of the past. However, retrieving diatom sed aDNA in marine environments can be challenging due to trace amounts being preserved in the sediment record. Optimising existing protocols is thus essential to maximise diatom sed aDNA yield. This study compares six methods to determine the best approach for recovering diatom sed aDNA from Antarctic marine sediment cores. The same six samples from two sites - U1536C (West Antarctica) and KC02 (East Antarctica), were extracted. Post shotgun sequencing, the methods were evaluated based on diatom sed aDNA recovery, fragment length, and species diversity. Results showed that method performance in retrieving the highest number of Bacillariophyta (diatom) reads is primarily driven by site (R 2 = 0.593, p = 0.001) and sample age (R 2 = 0.401, p = 0.001), while the extraction method had minimal influence (R 2 = 0.001, p = 0.064). The SiMAG method proved highly effective in U1536C but was entirely ineffective in KC02, where the COM Short method successfully recovered diatom sed aDNA. Other methods, including COM QG, PPKIT, and PB, consistently resulted in low sed aDNA yields. Differences in the diversity and the relative abundance of taxonomic classes were also seen across methods (χ2 88.04 to 99,664.17). This study serves as a focal point for experiments aiming to maximise diatom sed aDNA recovery enabling accurate reconstructions of Antarctic marine ecosystems. • Comparison of six sed aDNA methods reveals significant variations in diatom recovery. • Scotia Sea samples (young) showed better sed aDNA recovery than Sabrina Coast samples (older). • SiMAG excels in high-yield U1536C extractions. • COM Short excels in low-yield KC02 extractions. • PERMANOVA: site and age of samples drives diatom sed aDNA retrieval.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Micropaleontology
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2025.102477
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) retrieval from Antarctic diatoms

Linda Armbrecht, Michael E Weber, Prashasti Singh, Christopher J. S. Bolch et al.
1 citations
Marine Micropaleontology
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
1.72
article

Enhanced sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) retrieval from Antarctic diatoms

Linda Armbrecht, Michael E Weber, Prashasti Singh, Christopher J. S. Bolch, João C. Teixeira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Diatom microfossils are key environmental indicators and an important proxy in paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Sedimentary ancient DNA ( sed aDNA) complements microfossil analysis by detecting poorly preserved diatoms and distinguishing morphologically similar taxa, painting a more detailed picture of the past. However, retrieving diatom sed aDNA in marine environments can be challenging due to trace amounts being preserved in the sediment record. Optimising existing protocols is thus essential to maximise diatom sed aDNA yield. This study compares six methods to determine the best approach for recovering diatom sed aDNA from Antarctic marine sediment cores. The same six samples from two sites - U1536C (West Antarctica) and KC02 (East Antarctica), were extracted. Post shotgun sequencing, the methods were evaluated based on diatom sed aDNA recovery, fragment length, and species diversity. Results showed that method performance in retrieving the highest number of Bacillariophyta (diatom) reads is primarily driven by site (R 2 = 0.593, p = 0.001) and sample age (R 2 = 0.401, p = 0.001), while the extraction method had minimal influence (R 2 = 0.001, p = 0.064). The SiMAG method proved highly effective in U1536C but was entirely ineffective in KC02, where the COM Short method successfully recovered diatom sed aDNA. Other methods, including COM QG, PPKIT, and PB, consistently resulted in low sed aDNA yields. Differences in the diversity and the relative abundance of taxonomic classes were also seen across methods (χ2 88.04 to 99,664.17). This study serves as a focal point for experiments aiming to maximise diatom sed aDNA recovery enabling accurate reconstructions of Antarctic marine ecosystems. • Comparison of six sed aDNA methods reveals significant variations in diatom recovery. • Scotia Sea samples (young) showed better sed aDNA recovery than Sabrina Coast samples (older). • SiMAG excels in high-yield U1536C extractions. • COM Short excels in low-yield KC02 extractions. • PERMANOVA: site and age of samples drives diatom sed aDNA retrieval.

Marine MicropaleontologyVol. 199
Australian National University (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Australian Antarctic Division (AU), University of Bonn (DE), University of Coimbra (PT)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.