Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: ecological plausibility and performance metrics

• Ecological plausibility of species-distribution models is often neglected • Traditional optimal performance metrics often yield implausible models • Temperature response should comply with the ecological niche concept • Performance metrics based on decadal changes are better for climate studies • Temperature bell-shape responses provide better models for climate projections Species Distribution Models (SDMs) are widely used tools for studying potential climate-induced shifts in species distribution to support future marine spatial planning. However, the ecological plausibility of selected models is often neglected, particularly in marine ecosystems, resulting in potentially misleading outcomes, especially when climate effects are of concern. In this study we modeled the distribution of 11 commercial fish species in the North Sea using 57 years of observations and 60 SDMs with various degrees of freedom and aimed to improve the ecological plausibility of SDMs by evaluating common model selection techniques. Model performance was evaluated using deviances obtained with three cross-validation designs, Akaike Information Criterion, median absolute deviation and percentage of local mismatch. We identified top performing models based on consistent good scores of those metrics and assessed the ecological plausibility of all models. Specifically, we tested whether the modeled temperature response curve aligned with the ecological niche concept, i.e. having a bell shape within the plausible temperature range for each species, where the highest habitat suitability should relate to optimal conditions. The tested performance metrics often yielded conflicting outcomes and selected models with implausible temperature response curves that had poor extrapolation skills in temperature space and, thus, may result in unreliable predictions under climate change. Building on our findings, we provide recommendations for future SDM applications to improve their accuracy, ecological plausibility and predictive skills in climate-related studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Modelling
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111207
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: ecological plausibility and performance metrics

Daniel Oesterwind, Maria E. Pierce, Dario Fiorentino, Anna Akimova et al.
3 citations
Ecological Modelling
Species Distribution and Climate Change
5.51
article

Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: ecological plausibility and performance metrics

Daniel Oesterwind, Maria E. Pierce, Dario Fiorentino, Anna Akimova, Ismael Núñez‐Riboni
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Ecological plausibility of species-distribution models is often neglected • Traditional optimal performance metrics often yield implausible models • Temperature response should comply with the ecological niche concept • Performance metrics based on decadal changes are better for climate studies • Temperature bell-shape responses provide better models for climate projections Species Distribution Models (SDMs) are widely used tools for studying potential climate-induced shifts in species distribution to support future marine spatial planning. However, the ecological plausibility of selected models is often neglected, particularly in marine ecosystems, resulting in potentially misleading outcomes, especially when climate effects are of concern. In this study we modeled the distribution of 11 commercial fish species in the North Sea using 57 years of observations and 60 SDMs with various degrees of freedom and aimed to improve the ecological plausibility of SDMs by evaluating common model selection techniques. Model performance was evaluated using deviances obtained with three cross-validation designs, Akaike Information Criterion, median absolute deviation and percentage of local mismatch. We identified top performing models based on consistent good scores of those metrics and assessed the ecological plausibility of all models. Specifically, we tested whether the modeled temperature response curve aligned with the ecological niche concept, i.e. having a bell shape within the plausible temperature range for each species, where the highest habitat suitability should relate to optimal conditions. The tested performance metrics often yielded conflicting outcomes and selected models with implausible temperature response curves that had poor extrapolation skills in temperature space and, thus, may result in unreliable predictions under climate change. Building on our findings, we provide recommendations for future SDM applications to improve their accuracy, ecological plausibility and predictive skills in climate-related studies.

Ecological ModellingVol. 508
Hochschule Bremerhaven (DE), Leibniz Institute for Catalysis (DE), Klinikum Südstadt Rostock (DE)
European Commission, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
5.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.