Modeling interfacial area concentration for boiling flow systems

Accurately modeling the interfacial area concentration (IAC) or Sauter mean diameter (SMD) is critical for robust analyses of boiling two-phase flows. IAC is closely related to the void fraction (VF) and SMD, i.e., IAC = 6 × VF/SMD. Since reliable one-dimensional drift-flux correlations are available to predict VF, IAC can be determined, provided SMD is accurately predicted. This study introduced a new methodology that systematically developed an SMD model for boiling flows by incorporating bubble Reynolds number, viscosity number, VF, and density ratio as key parameters. The model validation was conducted for a wide range of flow conditions, consisting of both subcooled and saturated boiling flows (thermal equilibrium quality from −0.3 to 0.1), different channel geometries (circular pipes, subchannels, and annuli) and fluid media (water, R-113, and R-12), hydraulic diameters of 17.7–34.6 mm, superficial gas velocities of 0.01–2.4 m/s, superficial liquid velocities of 0.16–2.8 m/s, VF of 0.01–0.47, pressures of 0.10–2.7 MPa, mass fluxes of 150–3000 kg/m 2 s, and density ratios of 0.0006–0.17. The proposed model captured distinct behaviors of SMD against VF and demonstrated excellent predictive performance with good agreement between predictions and experimental data. The mean absolute percentage errors for SMD and IAC predictions were 19.0 % and 22.9 %, respectively, indicating their high reliability. • Interfacial area concentration (IAC) datasets for boiling flows were established. • IAC was modeled based on the newly modeled Sauter mean diameter (SMD) model. • SMD showed different behavior below and above the critical void fraction. • The IAC and SMD models demonstrated excellent prediction accuracy. • The developed model for boiling flows was validated to the pressure of 2.7 MPa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109193
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling interfacial area concentration for boiling flow systems

Takashi Hibiki, Kelei Song
1 links
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
article

Modeling interfacial area concentration for boiling flow systems

Takashi Hibiki, Kelei Song
article en

Abstract

Accurately modeling the interfacial area concentration (IAC) or Sauter mean diameter (SMD) is critical for robust analyses of boiling two-phase flows. IAC is closely related to the void fraction (VF) and SMD, i.e., IAC = 6 × VF/SMD. Since reliable one-dimensional drift-flux correlations are available to predict VF, IAC can be determined, provided SMD is accurately predicted. This study introduced a new methodology that systematically developed an SMD model for boiling flows by incorporating bubble Reynolds number, viscosity number, VF, and density ratio as key parameters. The model validation was conducted for a wide range of flow conditions, consisting of both subcooled and saturated boiling flows (thermal equilibrium quality from −0.3 to 0.1), different channel geometries (circular pipes, subchannels, and annuli) and fluid media (water, R-113, and R-12), hydraulic diameters of 17.7–34.6 mm, superficial gas velocities of 0.01–2.4 m/s, superficial liquid velocities of 0.16–2.8 m/s, VF of 0.01–0.47, pressures of 0.10–2.7 MPa, mass fluxes of 150–3000 kg/m 2 s, and density ratios of 0.0006–0.17. The proposed model captured distinct behaviors of SMD against VF and demonstrated excellent predictive performance with good agreement between predictions and experimental data. The mean absolute percentage errors for SMD and IAC predictions were 19.0 % and 22.9 %, respectively, indicating their high reliability. • Interfacial area concentration (IAC) datasets for boiling flows were established. • IAC was modeled based on the newly modeled Sauter mean diameter (SMD) model. • SMD showed different behavior below and above the critical void fraction. • The IAC and SMD models demonstrated excellent prediction accuracy. • The developed model for boiling flows was validated to the pressure of 2.7 MPa.

International Communications in Heat and Mass TransferVol. 166
City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Nuclear Regulation Authority, Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.