Do auditors charge clients with higher audit fees for blockchain investments?

This study examines the impact of clients’ blockchain investments on audit fees. Using a sample of A-share Chinese listed firms spanning the 2015–2019 period, we find a positive association between blockchain investments and audit fees, which is stronger for client firms that have adopted blockchain than those that have only invested in this technology. Our channel analysis further reveals that higher audit fees stem from the increase in client firms’ audit risk and the greater effort in audit planning and execution by the auditors. The positive association between blockchain investments and audit fees is attenuated by audit firms’ extensive information technology (IT) experience and is intensified by considerable external attention to clients’ blockchain activities. Our results are robust to a battery of endogeneity and other robustness checks. This research casts new light on the interactions between disruptive technologies and external auditor practices, as reflected in audit fees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2025.100707
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do auditors charge clients with higher audit fees for blockchain investments?

Jason Zezhong Xiao, Jean Jinghan Chen, Huang Ling-yu, Haoyu Zhang
3 citations
Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
11.73
article

Do auditors charge clients with higher audit fees for blockchain investments?

Jason Zezhong Xiao, Jean Jinghan Chen, Huang Ling-yu, Haoyu Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study examines the impact of clients’ blockchain investments on audit fees. Using a sample of A-share Chinese listed firms spanning the 2015–2019 period, we find a positive association between blockchain investments and audit fees, which is stronger for client firms that have adopted blockchain than those that have only invested in this technology. Our channel analysis further reveals that higher audit fees stem from the increase in client firms’ audit risk and the greater effort in audit planning and execution by the auditors. The positive association between blockchain investments and audit fees is attenuated by audit firms’ extensive information technology (IT) experience and is intensified by considerable external attention to clients’ blockchain activities. Our results are robust to a battery of endogeneity and other robustness checks. This research casts new light on the interactions between disruptive technologies and external auditor practices, as reflected in audit fees.

Journal of International Accounting Auditing and TaxationVol. 59
University of Leeds (GB), Guangxi University (CN), University of Macau (MO), University of Kent (GB), City University of Macau (MO)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Universidade de Macau
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do auditors charge clients with higher audit fees for blockchain investments? — Jason Zezhong Xiao, Jean Jinghan Chen, et al. · Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS