Covid-19 Sentiment Analysis on X (formerly Twitter) Using Machine Learning Classifiers: Performance Comparison and Key Insights

The current generation and widely used platforms like X (formerly Twitter) enable the study of public attitudes toward important topics, including the COVID-19 outbreak. In this paper, machine learning approaches (ML) are employed to build a sentiment analysis system for COVID-19 hashtagged tweets. We employed four ML classifiers, namely Naïve Bayes (NB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF), to classify the tweets into positive, negative, and neutral sentiments. In total, the examined dataset includes 178,240 tweets that are related to COVID-19 and were preprocessed through natural language processing. To assess the performance of the classifiers, we used accuracy, precision and recall, and F1 score. The results show that the DT classifier has the highest accuracy of 94% when compared to other models concerning precision and recall. Undersampling and oversampling were the techniques examined for addressing the issue of class imbalance. Such findings imply that ML, especially the SVM and DTs, can be useful in the next large-scale public sentiment analysis during a pandemic. Among the recommendations for further enhancements of the sentiment analysis approaches and their use in monitoring people’s reactions to social media during the pandemic are included in the paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
VFAST Transactions on Software Engineering
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21015/vtse.v13i2.2103
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Covid-19 Sentiment Analysis on X (formerly Twitter) Using Machine Learning Classifiers: Performance Comparison and Key Insights

Khurshed Ali, Muhammad Ismail, Mohammad Asif Khan, Muhammad Ali Shaikh et al.
VFAST Transactions on Software Engineering
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Covid-19 Sentiment Analysis on X (formerly Twitter) Using Machine Learning Classifiers: Performance Comparison and Key Insights

Khurshed Ali, Muhammad Ismail, Mohammad Asif Khan, Muhammad Ali Shaikh, Pir Bakhsh, Salahudin Jokhio
article en

Abstract

The current generation and widely used platforms like X (formerly Twitter) enable the study of public attitudes toward important topics, including the COVID-19 outbreak. In this paper, machine learning approaches (ML) are employed to build a sentiment analysis system for COVID-19 hashtagged tweets. We employed four ML classifiers, namely Naïve Bayes (NB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF), to classify the tweets into positive, negative, and neutral sentiments. In total, the examined dataset includes 178,240 tweets that are related to COVID-19 and were preprocessed through natural language processing. To assess the performance of the classifiers, we used accuracy, precision and recall, and F1 score. The results show that the DT classifier has the highest accuracy of 94% when compared to other models concerning precision and recall. Undersampling and oversampling were the techniques examined for addressing the issue of class imbalance. Such findings imply that ML, especially the SVM and DTs, can be useful in the next large-scale public sentiment analysis during a pandemic. Among the recommendations for further enhancements of the sentiment analysis approaches and their use in monitoring people’s reactions to social media during the pandemic are included in the paper.

VFAST Transactions on Software EngineeringVol. 13(2)
University of Victoria (CA), National Textile University (PK), Sukkur IBA University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.