Wave energy in season: a comparative approach to feasibility of seasonal deployments for remote coastal communities

Remote coastal communities, which could be early adopters of wave energy projects, have concerns over costs, conflicts, and potential risks of development. Designers and developers are challenged to address these community concerns as they continue to develop wave energy technologies. One potential means of reducing costs, conflicts, and risks, especially for demonstration and pilot-scale projects, could be planning a deployment that operates for only a portion of the year—a seasonal deployment. In this paper we examine the impacts of a seasonal deployment in terms of cost, electricity production, operations and maintenance, environmental impacts, and community benefits. We take a holistic, comparative approach to feasibility that can be replicated for other comparative studies. We estimate electricity production using a point absorber WEC modeled near Sitka, AK, USA and optimized for the given sea conditions. We determine that, for remote community sized projects, seasonal deployments could result in small cost savings (less than 10 %), but larger decreases in annual energy production (around 30 % for our case study area). Seasonal deployments could be preferable in places with seasonal energy needs, if failures and device access become a major hindrance to wave energy technology development, or as a cautionary approach to introducing new technology to the oceans. We also determine that a highly seasonal wave resource is not necessarily a requirement for seasonal deployments to be considered. Seasonal deployments are an alternative to year-round deployments that can be considered in places where marine spatial conflict is a seasonal concern. • Presents a holistic, comparative approach to feasibility investigations. • Assesses the potential impacts of seasonal wave energy deployments. • Compares operations and maintenance costs and their locality. • Optimizes negative spring wave energy converter for Sitka, AK.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126206
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wave energy in season: a comparative approach to feasibility of seasonal deployments for remote coastal communities

Molly Grear, Daniel Gaebele, Ali Trueworthy, Kristin Jones et al.
2 citations
Applied Energy
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
2.29
article

Wave energy in season: a comparative approach to feasibility of seasonal deployments for remote coastal communities

Molly Grear, Daniel Gaebele, Ali Trueworthy, Kristin Jones, Ian Hermanson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Remote coastal communities, which could be early adopters of wave energy projects, have concerns over costs, conflicts, and potential risks of development. Designers and developers are challenged to address these community concerns as they continue to develop wave energy technologies. One potential means of reducing costs, conflicts, and risks, especially for demonstration and pilot-scale projects, could be planning a deployment that operates for only a portion of the year—a seasonal deployment. In this paper we examine the impacts of a seasonal deployment in terms of cost, electricity production, operations and maintenance, environmental impacts, and community benefits. We take a holistic, comparative approach to feasibility that can be replicated for other comparative studies. We estimate electricity production using a point absorber WEC modeled near Sitka, AK, USA and optimized for the given sea conditions. We determine that, for remote community sized projects, seasonal deployments could result in small cost savings (less than 10 %), but larger decreases in annual energy production (around 30 % for our case study area). Seasonal deployments could be preferable in places with seasonal energy needs, if failures and device access become a major hindrance to wave energy technology development, or as a cautionary approach to introducing new technology to the oceans. We also determine that a highly seasonal wave resource is not necessarily a requirement for seasonal deployments to be considered. Seasonal deployments are an alternative to year-round deployments that can be considered in places where marine spatial conflict is a seasonal concern. • Presents a holistic, comparative approach to feasibility investigations. • Assesses the potential impacts of seasonal wave energy deployments. • Compares operations and maintenance costs and their locality. • Optimizes negative spring wave energy converter for Sitka, AK.

Applied EnergyVol. 396
Oregon State University (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Sandia National Laboratories California (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Oregon State University, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Water Power Technologies Office, Sandia National Laboratories, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.