The effects of climatic and soil properties on soil water repellency

• Regional evaluation of climate and soil contributions to soil water repellency (SWR). • Particle size and soil organic carbon contents were the strongest predictors of SWR. • Mean maximum temperature had a significant, negative relationship with SWR. • SWR induced by increased OC should be considered in carbon mitigation projects. Soil water repellency (SWR) is a major agro-ecological soil management issue caused by hydrophobic organic compounds that hinder soil water absorption and affect soil function. Recent modelling studies indicate that climate change will increase the severity of SWR, compounding these effects. This study investigated the effects of climatic and soil factors on SWR in surface (0–10 cm) soils from 355 sites under uniform land-use across an area of 60,000 km 2 in south-western Australia, a region with a Mediterranean climate. There were marked gradients in temperature (mean minimum temperature (Meanmin, 7.7–12.2 °C), mean maximum temperature (Meanmax, 19.0–22.9 °C), rainfall (507–1443 mm/year) and pan evaporation (Evap, 1169–1772 mm/year) across the sites. SWR was measured in the laboratory on oven dried samples using the ethanol droplet test. Boosted regression tree analysis showed that 10 soil variables explained 78 % of the variance in SWR, with clay, silt and OC contents the main contributors. Incorporating the four climatic variables explained 84 % of the variance of SWR, with Meanmax the major contributing factor. Thus, while soil properties dominated the expression of SWR, climate had a secondary impact. Meanmax however, was inversely related to SWR, suggesting that rising temperatures due to climate change could result in a reduction in SWR. Furthermore, given the strong relationship between SWR and OC content, climate mitigation projects aimed at enhancing soil OC storage may inadvertently increase the expression and severity of SWR. Recognition of this should be included in soil carbon mitigation project protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CATENA
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.109218
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of climatic and soil properties on soil water repellency

David J. Henry, R.J. Harper, Maria Then, Soudabeh Shemehsavar
4 citations
CATENA
Fire effects on ecosystems
4.42
article

The effects of climatic and soil properties on soil water repellency

David J. Henry, R.J. Harper, Maria Then, Soudabeh Shemehsavar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Regional evaluation of climate and soil contributions to soil water repellency (SWR). • Particle size and soil organic carbon contents were the strongest predictors of SWR. • Mean maximum temperature had a significant, negative relationship with SWR. • SWR induced by increased OC should be considered in carbon mitigation projects. Soil water repellency (SWR) is a major agro-ecological soil management issue caused by hydrophobic organic compounds that hinder soil water absorption and affect soil function. Recent modelling studies indicate that climate change will increase the severity of SWR, compounding these effects. This study investigated the effects of climatic and soil factors on SWR in surface (0–10 cm) soils from 355 sites under uniform land-use across an area of 60,000 km 2 in south-western Australia, a region with a Mediterranean climate. There were marked gradients in temperature (mean minimum temperature (Meanmin, 7.7–12.2 °C), mean maximum temperature (Meanmax, 19.0–22.9 °C), rainfall (507–1443 mm/year) and pan evaporation (Evap, 1169–1772 mm/year) across the sites. SWR was measured in the laboratory on oven dried samples using the ethanol droplet test. Boosted regression tree analysis showed that 10 soil variables explained 78 % of the variance in SWR, with clay, silt and OC contents the main contributors. Incorporating the four climatic variables explained 84 % of the variance of SWR, with Meanmax the major contributing factor. Thus, while soil properties dominated the expression of SWR, climate had a secondary impact. Meanmax however, was inversely related to SWR, suggesting that rising temperatures due to climate change could result in a reduction in SWR. Furthermore, given the strong relationship between SWR and OC content, climate mitigation projects aimed at enhancing soil OC storage may inadvertently increase the expression and severity of SWR. Recognition of this should be included in soil carbon mitigation project protocols.

CATENAVol. 258
Murdoch University (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fire effects on ecosystems
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.