Predicting footpad lesion scores of Dutch broiler flocks using routinely collected data

• Dynamic linear models and random forests are applied to footpad lesion data • Footpad lesions scores are predicted with 74.4% sensitivity and 60.2% specificity • Previous footpad lesion scores are an important predictor for the next flock score • Meteorological data improves the prediction of high footpad lesion scores Footpad lesions (FPL) are a prevalent welfare concern in broilers, influenced by various factors such as farm management practices and season. In the Netherlands, FPL scores are monitored at slaughter and linked to corrective measures. Early prediction of FPL scores could enable timely interventions. This study investigated the potential of routinely collected data to predict FPL scores at slaughter. Data from 592 broiler houses, each with at least 30 consecutive flocks, across 190 farms were included. The ability of various models to predict FPL score above or below the threshold of 80 was compared. These models included univariate dynamic linear models (DLMs); multivariate DLMs using weather data of the first week of the production cycle; and random forest models using previous flock scores or DLM output, first-week weather variables, and current and previous flock and farm characteristics. Incorporation of DLM output in the random forest model provided the numerically highest performance, although this was not significantly better than the random forest model with raw previous flock scores. This model achieved an ROC AUC of 0.70, with the best threshold yielding a sensitivity of 74.4% and specificity of 60.2%. Previous flock FPL was the most important predictor, followed by the fraction of birds thinned, flock size difference between previous and current flock, and outside humidity. These findings highlight the value of weather variables in predicting FPL scores. Future research should explore additional factors which could explain within-house variation, such as indoor climate and feed changes, to improve predictive accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.101080
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting footpad lesion scores of Dutch broiler flocks using routinely collected data

Arjan Stegeman, Dan Børge Jensen, Miel Hostens, Yara Slegers et al.
Smart Agricultural Technology
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Predicting footpad lesion scores of Dutch broiler flocks using routinely collected data

Arjan Stegeman, Dan Børge Jensen, Miel Hostens, Yara Slegers, Sjaak de Wit
article en

Abstract

• Dynamic linear models and random forests are applied to footpad lesion data • Footpad lesions scores are predicted with 74.4% sensitivity and 60.2% specificity • Previous footpad lesion scores are an important predictor for the next flock score • Meteorological data improves the prediction of high footpad lesion scores Footpad lesions (FPL) are a prevalent welfare concern in broilers, influenced by various factors such as farm management practices and season. In the Netherlands, FPL scores are monitored at slaughter and linked to corrective measures. Early prediction of FPL scores could enable timely interventions. This study investigated the potential of routinely collected data to predict FPL scores at slaughter. Data from 592 broiler houses, each with at least 30 consecutive flocks, across 190 farms were included. The ability of various models to predict FPL score above or below the threshold of 80 was compared. These models included univariate dynamic linear models (DLMs); multivariate DLMs using weather data of the first week of the production cycle; and random forest models using previous flock scores or DLM output, first-week weather variables, and current and previous flock and farm characteristics. Incorporation of DLM output in the random forest model provided the numerically highest performance, although this was not significantly better than the random forest model with raw previous flock scores. This model achieved an ROC AUC of 0.70, with the best threshold yielding a sensitivity of 74.4% and specificity of 60.2%. Previous flock FPL was the most important predictor, followed by the fraction of birds thinned, flock size difference between previous and current flock, and outside humidity. These findings highlight the value of weather variables in predicting FPL scores. Future research should explore additional factors which could explain within-house variation, such as indoor climate and feed changes, to improve predictive accuracy.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 12
University of Copenhagen (DK), Utrecht University (NL), Cornell University (US), Ghent University (BE), New York State College of Agriculture & Life Sciences (US), Royal GD (Netherlands) (NL)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Horizon 2020
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.