Assessment of performance and its scalability in microservice architectures: Systematic literature review

The microservice architecture structures an application as a collection of small autonomous services, enhancing development practices and maintainability. It impacts system performance and scalability, which are influenced by the architectural design, the system deployment, and usage. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review (SLR) on the assessment of performance and scalability in the microservice architecture, aiming to identify research gaps and assess the current state of knowledge. The review protocol screened 801 studies, selecting 29 primary studies for detailed analysis. We perform comparisons of studies and try to identify the main gaps in current research and suggest areas for further investigation. The main conclusion is that the current research partially addresses the dimensions associated with the performance and scalability qualities of microservice systems. In particular, there is a lack of comparative studies of architectural patterns and styles or comparable assessment models and methods. Therefore, a systematic approach is lacking and the paper reports a set of open research trends to guide researchers in the area of microservice-based software architecture quality assessment. • The paper answers the following research question: How does current research on microservice architectures, performance, and scalability address the architectural dimensions used in end-to-end scalability assessment? • We performed a systematic literature review on the performance and scalability assessment of microservice architectures, where we screened 801 studies to select 29 primary studies that were used to provide an overview of the state of the art. • We introduced a systematic framework for the analysis of performance and scalability assessment methodologies, and analyzed the 29 primary studies according to this analysis framework. • We conclude that current research mainly focuses on some of the dimensions of the microservice architecture, namely the aspects associated with deployment architectures. In addition, it is difficult to compare the different studies because they address different aspects of the dimensions. • We report a set of open research trends to guide researchers in the area of microservice-based software architecture quality assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Systems and Software
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.112500
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Software System Performance and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of performance and its scalability in microservice architectures: Systematic literature review

Alberto Avritzer, António Rito Silva, Helena Rodrigues
3 citations
Journal of Systems and Software
Software System Performance and Reliability
4.46
article

Assessment of performance and its scalability in microservice architectures: Systematic literature review

Alberto Avritzer, António Rito Silva, Helena Rodrigues
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The microservice architecture structures an application as a collection of small autonomous services, enhancing development practices and maintainability. It impacts system performance and scalability, which are influenced by the architectural design, the system deployment, and usage. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review (SLR) on the assessment of performance and scalability in the microservice architecture, aiming to identify research gaps and assess the current state of knowledge. The review protocol screened 801 studies, selecting 29 primary studies for detailed analysis. We perform comparisons of studies and try to identify the main gaps in current research and suggest areas for further investigation. The main conclusion is that the current research partially addresses the dimensions associated with the performance and scalability qualities of microservice systems. In particular, there is a lack of comparative studies of architectural patterns and styles or comparable assessment models and methods. Therefore, a systematic approach is lacking and the paper reports a set of open research trends to guide researchers in the area of microservice-based software architecture quality assessment. • The paper answers the following research question: How does current research on microservice architectures, performance, and scalability address the architectural dimensions used in end-to-end scalability assessment? • We performed a systematic literature review on the performance and scalability assessment of microservice architectures, where we screened 801 studies to select 29 primary studies that were used to provide an overview of the state of the art. • We introduced a systematic framework for the analysis of performance and scalability assessment methodologies, and analyzed the 29 primary studies according to this analysis framework. • We conclude that current research mainly focuses on some of the dimensions of the microservice architecture, namely the aspects associated with deployment architectures. In addition, it is difficult to compare the different studies because they address different aspects of the dimensions. • We report a set of open research trends to guide researchers in the area of microservice-based software architecture quality assessment.

Journal of Systems and SoftwareVol. 230
Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento (PT), University of Lisbon (PT), University of Minho (PT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Software System Performance and Reliability
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.