Reflections from a Radical Killjoy

Abstract This article critically assesses anthropological responses to the Gaza massacre following the October 7, 2023, attacks. I warn against the dangers of a single, reductive narrative and highlight the harmful effects of discourse policing. While terms like “genocide” convey the gravity of the massacre and mobilize support, they also reinforce false binaries, reify distinctions between Palestine and Israel, and disconnect Gaza from the broader Palestinian context—obscuring the realities of military occupation, settler colonialism, and apartheid. I argue that the current onslaught should also be recognized as the inevitable lethal outcome of the global reemergence of ethnonationalism. The insistence on a singular narrative, terminology, or form of action does not benefit the struggle for Palestinian freedom and justice. This article poses a sharp critique, but is ultimately a plea for the creation of spaces for resistances—plural—and for anthropologists to play our role in the human rights struggle of our time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Anthropologist
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/25891715-bja10072
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflections from a Radical Killjoy

A. de Jong
1 citations
Public Anthropologist
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
4.20
article

Reflections from a Radical Killjoy

A. de Jong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article critically assesses anthropological responses to the Gaza massacre following the October 7, 2023, attacks. I warn against the dangers of a single, reductive narrative and highlight the harmful effects of discourse policing. While terms like “genocide” convey the gravity of the massacre and mobilize support, they also reinforce false binaries, reify distinctions between Palestine and Israel, and disconnect Gaza from the broader Palestinian context—obscuring the realities of military occupation, settler colonialism, and apartheid. I argue that the current onslaught should also be recognized as the inevitable lethal outcome of the global reemergence of ethnonationalism. The insistence on a singular narrative, terminology, or form of action does not benefit the struggle for Palestinian freedom and justice. This article poses a sharp critique, but is ultimately a plea for the creation of spaces for resistances—plural—and for anthropologists to play our role in the human rights struggle of our time.

Public AnthropologistVol. 7(2)
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reflections from a Radical Killjoy — A. de Jong · Public Anthropologist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS