Collective Guilt, Denial, and Punishment in Austria

Abstract This article argues that “collective guilt” about the Holocaust operates as an emotional complex, largely inscribed within experiences of Austrianness and Germanness, which affects public opinion and policy about Palestine and Palestinians. Israel’s mobilization of this emotional complex is a key component of its realpolitik strategy, serving as legitimization to inflict “collective punishment” on the Palestinian population and to remain uncensored. Besides, the article shows how collective guilt informed a compromise after ww 2 that created a new European subject, which informed international institutions claiming to act for humanity. The article concludes that “collective guilt” is at the root of the denial of Palestinian suffering in the German-speaking context, and the exponential criminalization and repression of pro-Palestinian expressions that especially target political activists and academics. The article also concludes that an efficient praxis to re-inscribe Palestinians (and others) within European notions of humanity needs to focus on both realpolitik and affect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Anthropologist
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/25891715-bja10073
Citations
2
Primary Topic
History of Emotions Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
76.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collective Guilt, Denial, and Punishment in Austria

Leonardo Schiocchet
2 citations
Public Anthropologist
History of Emotions Research
76.01
article

Collective Guilt, Denial, and Punishment in Austria

Leonardo Schiocchet
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article argues that “collective guilt” about the Holocaust operates as an emotional complex, largely inscribed within experiences of Austrianness and Germanness, which affects public opinion and policy about Palestine and Palestinians. Israel’s mobilization of this emotional complex is a key component of its realpolitik strategy, serving as legitimization to inflict “collective punishment” on the Palestinian population and to remain uncensored. Besides, the article shows how collective guilt informed a compromise after ww 2 that created a new European subject, which informed international institutions claiming to act for humanity. The article concludes that “collective guilt” is at the root of the denial of Palestinian suffering in the German-speaking context, and the exponential criminalization and repression of pro-Palestinian expressions that especially target political activists and academics. The article also concludes that an efficient praxis to re-inscribe Palestinians (and others) within European notions of humanity needs to focus on both realpolitik and affect.

Public AnthropologistVol. 7(2)
Charles University (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
History of Emotions Research
76.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.