An Item Response Theory Model for Functional Assessment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Based on the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded

<bold>Objective</bold> To establish an item response theory (IRT) model for functional assessment of spinal muscular atrophy based on the Hammersmith functional motor scale expanded. <bold>Methods</bold> A total of 23 patients with SMA were treated with corrective treatment in the Department of Geriatric Neurology and the Department of Pediatrics of the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University from February 2021 to June 2023. IRT was constructed using these repeated measurement data based on stack design. The comparisons between well-fitted models were based on likelihood ratio. And item guessing, carelessness, difficultyand personal abilities (θ) of selected optimal model were calculated. Differential test functioning (DTF) test was conducted for gender and rehabilitation therapy to test the bias. Monte Carlo simulation was used to prove that the item difficulty distribution of the model was not affected by the sampling process. And person-item plot was drawn according to the median expected difficulty. and the differences in the difficulty of each item in HFMSE scale and personal abilities among each evaluations were discussed. <bold>Results</bold> A total of 32items were included in this study and 4 alternative models were constructed. Three-parametric logistic model was selected as the optimal model with the best fitness (P>0.05, M2 statistics = 479.75). In 3PLM, the caution of all items was 1, and the discrimination, guessing and difficulty of the items were calculated. There were no DTFs for gender and rehabilitation therapy. The results showed high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.955, LCRC = 0.981) and validity [θ value is positively correlated with the original total score (P&lt;0.001, r = 0.99)] of 3PLM. There was conversion between personal abilities θ value and the total score of the scale:θ=-1.63 + 0.0651TTS-1.39×10-5TTS2. A person-item plot showing the location of item parameters and individual parameters on the personal abilities (θ) scale was used to observe the relationship between θ values and item difficulties. <bold>Conclusion</bold> The IRT model based on HFMSE offered a new approach to evaluate functional levels of SMA patients and difficulties of items. The calculation of item guessing, carelessness and difficulty of selected optimal model provides recommendations for better clinical practice of HFMSE. The study offers a new perspective for the assessment of the functions of SMA patients and guidance for the development of rehabilitation programs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1329.2024.06011
Primary Topic
Medical Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Item Response Theory Model for Functional Assessment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Based on the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded

Feng Lin, Yimin Fan, Panli Ge, Xi Cheng et al.
Rehabilitation Medicine
Medical Research and Treatments
article

An Item Response Theory Model for Functional Assessment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Based on the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded

Feng Lin, Yimin Fan, Panli Ge, Xi Cheng, Yichen Zhang, Jianhui Chen
article en

Abstract

<bold>Objective</bold> To establish an item response theory (IRT) model for functional assessment of spinal muscular atrophy based on the Hammersmith functional motor scale expanded. <bold>Methods</bold> A total of 23 patients with SMA were treated with corrective treatment in the Department of Geriatric Neurology and the Department of Pediatrics of the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University from February 2021 to June 2023. IRT was constructed using these repeated measurement data based on stack design. The comparisons between well-fitted models were based on likelihood ratio. And item guessing, carelessness, difficultyand personal abilities (θ) of selected optimal model were calculated. Differential test functioning (DTF) test was conducted for gender and rehabilitation therapy to test the bias. Monte Carlo simulation was used to prove that the item difficulty distribution of the model was not affected by the sampling process. And person-item plot was drawn according to the median expected difficulty. and the differences in the difficulty of each item in HFMSE scale and personal abilities among each evaluations were discussed. <bold>Results</bold> A total of 32items were included in this study and 4 alternative models were constructed. Three-parametric logistic model was selected as the optimal model with the best fitness (P>0.05, M2 statistics = 479.75). In 3PLM, the caution of all items was 1, and the discrimination, guessing and difficulty of the items were calculated. There were no DTFs for gender and rehabilitation therapy. The results showed high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.955, LCRC = 0.981) and validity [θ value is positively correlated with the original total score (P&lt;0.001, r = 0.99)] of 3PLM. There was conversion between personal abilities θ value and the total score of the scale:θ=-1.63 + 0.0651TTS-1.39×10-5TTS2. A person-item plot showing the location of item parameters and individual parameters on the personal abilities (θ) scale was used to observe the relationship between θ values and item difficulties. <bold>Conclusion</bold> The IRT model based on HFMSE offered a new approach to evaluate functional levels of SMA patients and difficulties of items. The calculation of item guessing, carelessness and difficulty of selected optimal model provides recommendations for better clinical practice of HFMSE. The study offers a new perspective for the assessment of the functions of SMA patients and guidance for the development of rehabilitation programs.

Rehabilitation MedicineVol. 34(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Medical Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.