Review of simulations on land use change: a methodology based on bibliometric analysis

Introduction Land use change simulation is crucial for understanding global environmental changes and guiding sustainable land management. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 2,147 Web of Science articles from 1988 to 2023 to summarize research trends, thematic evolutions, and future directions in land use change modeling. Methods Using Biblioshiny tools, the study applies quantitative analytics, co-citation network mapping, and keyword clustering. Results The research reveals three developmental phases. From 1988 to 2000 (62 articles), foundational models like CLUE and CA were developed. During 2001–2016 (1,039 articles), there were advancements in coupled models and multi-scenario simulations. From 2017 to 2023 (1,046 articles), the focus shifted to integrative frameworks linking land dynamics, ecosystem services, and climate feedbacks. Annual publication outputs increased from 5 to 149, showing exponential growth. Key research themes involve computational modeling, spatiotemporal dynamics analysis, and environmental impact assessment. Recent trends highlight “river-basin,” “multi-source data fusion,” and “geographically weighted models,” indicating a move toward basin-scale simulations, machine learning integration, and policy-oriented scenarios. China, the U.S., and Germany lead in research output, with top institutions including Beijing Normal University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. China and the U.S. have strong domestic collaborations, while European countries have higher international collaboration ratios. Discussion The analysis points out research gaps, such as limited integration of socio-economic drivers and insufficient cross-scale modeling. Future research should focus on developing hybrid frameworks combining process-based and data-driven models, leveraging multi-source data for accuracy, and designing scenario-based models for sustainable development goals, especially in river basins and urbanizing regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1548565
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of simulations on land use change: a methodology based on bibliometric analysis

Liang Chi, Xiangyang Zhou, Jianzhai Wu, Luxin Huang et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Review of simulations on land use change: a methodology based on bibliometric analysis

Liang Chi, Xiangyang Zhou, Jianzhai Wu, Luxin Huang, Han Meng, Qingquan Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Land use change simulation is crucial for understanding global environmental changes and guiding sustainable land management. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 2,147 Web of Science articles from 1988 to 2023 to summarize research trends, thematic evolutions, and future directions in land use change modeling. Methods Using Biblioshiny tools, the study applies quantitative analytics, co-citation network mapping, and keyword clustering. Results The research reveals three developmental phases. From 1988 to 2000 (62 articles), foundational models like CLUE and CA were developed. During 2001–2016 (1,039 articles), there were advancements in coupled models and multi-scenario simulations. From 2017 to 2023 (1,046 articles), the focus shifted to integrative frameworks linking land dynamics, ecosystem services, and climate feedbacks. Annual publication outputs increased from 5 to 149, showing exponential growth. Key research themes involve computational modeling, spatiotemporal dynamics analysis, and environmental impact assessment. Recent trends highlight “river-basin,” “multi-source data fusion,” and “geographically weighted models,” indicating a move toward basin-scale simulations, machine learning integration, and policy-oriented scenarios. China, the U.S., and Germany lead in research output, with top institutions including Beijing Normal University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. China and the U.S. have strong domestic collaborations, while European countries have higher international collaboration ratios. Discussion The analysis points out research gaps, such as limited integration of socio-economic drivers and insufficient cross-scale modeling. Future research should focus on developing hybrid frameworks combining process-based and data-driven models, leveraging multi-source data for accuracy, and designing scenario-based models for sustainable development goals, especially in river basins and urbanizing regions.

Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 9
China University of Geosciences (CN), Agricultural Information Institute (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.