Let’s not steal equity from our patients in the name of quality

Healthcare can be, we believe, the vanguard to lead us to a more just society but has much work to do. Quality improvement (QI) processes drive care delivery based on metrics and reporting requirements, but equity is not a commonly used QI measure, and the extent of inequitable care affecting patients is unclear at best. While quality metrics can provide benchmarks for healthcare based on published evidence, quality metric standards that do not consider healthcare equity will not lead to the provision of equitable, patient-centered care. In fact, equity is separated from quality in most existing quality metric frameworks when, instead, achieving equity should be a central component of high-quality care. This is true even for leading health conditions, such as injury and violence. Yet, achieving equitable care is every patient's right and achieving healthcare equity should be a societal and bedside goal. We call for alignment between patients, healthcare providers, and healthcare organizations to unite health equity and healthcare quality metrics. Finally, we offer some recommendations and an example of success in pursuing and operationalizing health equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1522743
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Let’s not steal equity from our patients in the name of quality

Heather Barnett, Julia Velonjara, Zaher Kmail, Chelsea D. Hicks et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Let’s not steal equity from our patients in the name of quality

Heather Barnett, Julia Velonjara, Zaher Kmail, Chelsea D. Hicks, Edwin G. Lindo, Monica S. Vavilala, Jennifer Shi
article en

Abstract

Healthcare can be, we believe, the vanguard to lead us to a more just society but has much work to do. Quality improvement (QI) processes drive care delivery based on metrics and reporting requirements, but equity is not a commonly used QI measure, and the extent of inequitable care affecting patients is unclear at best. While quality metrics can provide benchmarks for healthcare based on published evidence, quality metric standards that do not consider healthcare equity will not lead to the provision of equitable, patient-centered care. In fact, equity is separated from quality in most existing quality metric frameworks when, instead, achieving equity should be a central component of high-quality care. This is true even for leading health conditions, such as injury and violence. Yet, achieving equitable care is every patient's right and achieving healthcare equity should be a societal and bedside goal. We call for alignment between patients, healthcare providers, and healthcare organizations to unite health equity and healthcare quality metrics. Finally, we offer some recommendations and an example of success in pursuing and operationalizing health equity.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 13
University of Washington (US), Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center (US), University of Washington Tacoma (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.