AI for mental health: clinician expectations and priorities in computational psychiatry

Mental disorders represent a major global health challenge, with an estimated lifetime prevalence approaching 30%. Despite the availability of effective treatments, access to mental health care remains inadequate. Computational psychiatry, leveraging advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), has shown potential for transforming mental health care by improving diagnosis, prognosis, and the personalization of treatment. However, integrating these technologies into routine clinical practice remains limited due to technical and infrastructure challenges. While ongoing computational developments will enhance AI's precision, many studies focus on its broad potential without providing specific, clinician-informed guidance for immediate application. To address this gap and the urgent need for clinically actionable AI tools, we surveyed 53 psychiatrists and clinical psychologists to identify their priorities for AI in mental health care. Our findings reveal a strong preference for tools enabling continuous monitoring and predictive modeling, particularly in outpatient settings. Clinicians prioritize accurate predictions of symptom trajectories and proactive patient monitoring over interpretability and explicit treatment recommendations. Self-reports, third-party observations, and sleep quality and duration emerged as key data inputs for effective models. Together, this study provides a clinician-driven roadmap for AI integration, emphasizing predictive models based on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data to forecast disorder trajectories and support real-world practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06957-3
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI for mental health: clinician expectations and priorities in computational psychiatry

Christoph Mulert, Antonia Schulz, Paul C. Mann, Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah et al.
6 citations
BMC Psychiatry
Mental Health Research Topics
12.71
article

AI for mental health: clinician expectations and priorities in computational psychiatry

Christoph Mulert, Antonia Schulz, Paul C. Mann, Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah, Jonathan Repple, Andreas Reif, Tim Hahn, Felix Bernhard, S H Alipoor Khodadadi, Stefan Becker, Stefan G. Hofmann, Sarah Kittel‐Schneider, Udo Dannlowski, Tilo T. J. Kircher, Ludger Fischer, Winfried Rief, Mary Nguyen, Hamidreza Jamalabadi, Amir Salamikhanshan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Mental disorders represent a major global health challenge, with an estimated lifetime prevalence approaching 30%. Despite the availability of effective treatments, access to mental health care remains inadequate. Computational psychiatry, leveraging advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), has shown potential for transforming mental health care by improving diagnosis, prognosis, and the personalization of treatment. However, integrating these technologies into routine clinical practice remains limited due to technical and infrastructure challenges. While ongoing computational developments will enhance AI's precision, many studies focus on its broad potential without providing specific, clinician-informed guidance for immediate application. To address this gap and the urgent need for clinically actionable AI tools, we surveyed 53 psychiatrists and clinical psychologists to identify their priorities for AI in mental health care. Our findings reveal a strong preference for tools enabling continuous monitoring and predictive modeling, particularly in outpatient settings. Clinicians prioritize accurate predictions of symptom trajectories and proactive patient monitoring over interpretability and explicit treatment recommendations. Self-reports, third-party observations, and sleep quality and duration emerged as key data inputs for effective models. Together, this study provides a clinician-driven roadmap for AI integration, emphasizing predictive models based on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data to forecast disorder trajectories and support real-world practice.

BMC PsychiatryVol. 25(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), University of Münster (DE), University College Cork (IE), Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology (DE), Brain (Germany) (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE), APC Microbiome Institute (IE)
Philipps-Universität Marburg, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Mental Health Research Topics
12.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.