THE DISTANCE OF SHORTENING PRAYER IN THE PAST AND PRESENT

The basic principle is that Islamic rulings are derived from the original sources of Islamic law, namely the Quran, the Sunnah, consensus, analogy, and other legal evidence whose validity is agreed upon and whose validity is disputed.This research paper examines the opinions of ancient and modern jurists regarding the ruling on the distance required for shortening the four-unit prayers for travelers, whether traveling by old means of transportation such as camels and other means of transportation commonly used in the past, or on foot. It also examines modern means of travel. In the past, travelers, whether on camels or on foot, experienced extreme hardship, fatigue, and exhaustion that cannot be compared to those experienced today. Travelers using modern means of transportation can cover the distance required for shortening prayers in a short time, perhaps minutes or hours at most. Is the ruling based on the distance traveled by any means, or is there another reason, namely the difficulty involved in traveling? This research paper aims to answer several questions, including: Is it permissible to consider the same distance for shortening prayers when traveling by modern means of transportation as for old means of transportation?In describing the problem under study, the researcher used the scientific method, which involves collecting and critiquing scholarly material and arriving at conclusions derived from the premises. The researcher sought to document texts from their reliable sources, transcribe Quranic verses in the Ottoman script, and extract hadiths from recognized Sunnah books. The descriptive and inductive approach was used to describe the problem, as was the comparative approach, which involved comparing the opinions of jurists and determining the most preponderant opinion, along with the reasons for the preponderance, if any.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/20896
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE DISTANCE OF SHORTENING PRAYER IN THE PAST AND PRESENT

Mohamed Mohamed Abdel Moneim Ali Ghanem, Ragab Abou Maliha Mohamed Soliman
International Journal of Advanced Research
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

THE DISTANCE OF SHORTENING PRAYER IN THE PAST AND PRESENT

Mohamed Mohamed Abdel Moneim Ali Ghanem, Ragab Abou Maliha Mohamed Soliman
article en

Abstract

The basic principle is that Islamic rulings are derived from the original sources of Islamic law, namely the Quran, the Sunnah, consensus, analogy, and other legal evidence whose validity is agreed upon and whose validity is disputed.This research paper examines the opinions of ancient and modern jurists regarding the ruling on the distance required for shortening the four-unit prayers for travelers, whether traveling by old means of transportation such as camels and other means of transportation commonly used in the past, or on foot. It also examines modern means of travel. In the past, travelers, whether on camels or on foot, experienced extreme hardship, fatigue, and exhaustion that cannot be compared to those experienced today. Travelers using modern means of transportation can cover the distance required for shortening prayers in a short time, perhaps minutes or hours at most. Is the ruling based on the distance traveled by any means, or is there another reason, namely the difficulty involved in traveling? This research paper aims to answer several questions, including: Is it permissible to consider the same distance for shortening prayers when traveling by modern means of transportation as for old means of transportation?In describing the problem under study, the researcher used the scientific method, which involves collecting and critiquing scholarly material and arriving at conclusions derived from the premises. The researcher sought to document texts from their reliable sources, transcribe Quranic verses in the Ottoman script, and extract hadiths from recognized Sunnah books. The descriptive and inductive approach was used to describe the problem, as was the comparative approach, which involved comparing the opinions of jurists and determining the most preponderant opinion, along with the reasons for the preponderance, if any.

International Journal of Advanced ResearchVol. 13(05)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.