Agreement between carotid and LVOT non-invasive cardiac output measurements in ED septic shock patients: a prospective observational study

Sepsis significantly impacts the circulatory system and is associated with high mortality rates, particularly in patients with septic shock who require urgent treatment. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring is a critical bedside tool for assessing fluid responsiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between cardiac output measurements obtained from the carotid artery and the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) in patients with septic shock in the emergency department (ED). A prospective observational study was conducted on adult patients diagnosed with septic shock and admitted to the ED between October 2023 and October 2024. Cardiac output was calculated using the standard formula (CO = VTI × cross-sectional area × heart rate) for both LVOT and carotid measurements. Agreement between LVOT-derived and carotid-derived cardiac output was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, and percentage error. Forty patients with septic shock were included in the study. The mean carotid blood flow was 0.855 L/min, while the mean cardiac output measured by LVOT echocardiography was 5.329 L/min. Cardiac output measurements derived from carotid artery VTI and LVOT VTI showed a moderate agreement, as demonstrated by Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient of 0.527 (p < 0.001) and an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (absolute agreement) of 0.695 (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of - 0.47 (95% CI: -2.11 to 1.17), with a concordance interval ranging from - 10.51 (95% CI: -13.35 to - 7.67) to 9.58 (95% CI: 6.74 to 12.42). Non-invasive cardiac output measurements from the carotid artery exhibited only moderate agreement with those derived from the LVOT, accompanied by wide limits of agreement. This indicates that the two methods should not be utilized interchangeably for clinical decision-making in individual patients. Carotid artery measurements should not be regarded as a direct replacement for LVOT examinations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05077-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agreement between carotid and LVOT non-invasive cardiac output measurements in ED septic shock patients: a prospective observational study

Sivit Chanthawatthanarak, Korakot Apiratwarakul, Somsak Tiamkao, Kamonwon Ienghong et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
6.02
article

Agreement between carotid and LVOT non-invasive cardiac output measurements in ED septic shock patients: a prospective observational study

Sivit Chanthawatthanarak, Korakot Apiratwarakul, Somsak Tiamkao, Kamonwon Ienghong, Lap Woon Cheung, Kiattida Boonasa
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Sepsis significantly impacts the circulatory system and is associated with high mortality rates, particularly in patients with septic shock who require urgent treatment. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring is a critical bedside tool for assessing fluid responsiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between cardiac output measurements obtained from the carotid artery and the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) in patients with septic shock in the emergency department (ED). A prospective observational study was conducted on adult patients diagnosed with septic shock and admitted to the ED between October 2023 and October 2024. Cardiac output was calculated using the standard formula (CO = VTI × cross-sectional area × heart rate) for both LVOT and carotid measurements. Agreement between LVOT-derived and carotid-derived cardiac output was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, and percentage error. Forty patients with septic shock were included in the study. The mean carotid blood flow was 0.855 L/min, while the mean cardiac output measured by LVOT echocardiography was 5.329 L/min. Cardiac output measurements derived from carotid artery VTI and LVOT VTI showed a moderate agreement, as demonstrated by Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient of 0.527 (p < 0.001) and an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (absolute agreement) of 0.695 (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of - 0.47 (95% CI: -2.11 to 1.17), with a concordance interval ranging from - 10.51 (95% CI: -13.35 to - 7.67) to 9.58 (95% CI: 6.74 to 12.42). Non-invasive cardiac output measurements from the carotid artery exhibited only moderate agreement with those derived from the LVOT, accompanied by wide limits of agreement. This indicates that the two methods should not be utilized interchangeably for clinical decision-making in individual patients. Carotid artery measurements should not be regarded as a direct replacement for LVOT examinations.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Khon Kaen University (TH), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Khon Kaen University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.