Development of bubble point pressure and oil formation volume factor models using pressure-volume-temperature data

The Pressure-Volume-Temperature (PVT) properties of crude oil are typically determined through laboratory analysis during the early phases of exploration and field development. However, due to extensive data required, time-consuming nature, and high costs, laboratory methods are often not preferred. Machine learning, with its efficiency and rapid convergence, has emerged as a promising alternative for PVT properties estimation. This study employs the modified particle swarm optimization-based group method of data handling (PSO-GMDH) to develop predictive models for estimating both the oil formation volume factor (OFVF) and bubble point pressure ( P b ). Data from the Mpyo oil field in Uganda were used to create the models. The input parameters included solution gas-oil ratio ( R s ), oil American Petroleum Institute gravity ( API ), specific gravity ( SG ), and reservoir temperature ( T ). The results demonstrated that PSO-GMDH outperformed backpropagation neural networks (BPNN) and radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN), achieving higher correlation coefficients and lower prediction errors during training and testing. For OFVF prediction, PSO-GMDH yielded a correlation coefficient ( R ) of 0.9979 (training) and 0.9876 (testing), with corresponding root mean square error ( RMSE ) values of 0.0021 and 0.0099, and mean absolute error ( MAE ) values of 0.00055 and 0.00256, respectively. For P b prediction, R was 0.9994 (training) and 0.9876 (testing), with RMSE values of 6.08 and 8.26, and MAE values of 1.35 and 2.63. The study also revealed that R s significantly impacts OFVF and P b predictions compared to other input parameters. The models followed physical laws and remained stable, demonstrating that PSO-GMDH is a robust and efficient method for predicting OFVF and P b , offering a time and cost-effective alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.02.027
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of bubble point pressure and oil formation volume factor models using pressure-volume-temperature data

Grant Charles Mwakipunda, Mbega Ramadhani Ngata, Allou Koffi Franck Kouassi, Melckzedeck Michael Mgimba et al.
2 citations
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.73
article

Development of bubble point pressure and oil formation volume factor models using pressure-volume-temperature data

Grant Charles Mwakipunda, Mbega Ramadhani Ngata, Allou Koffi Franck Kouassi, Melckzedeck Michael Mgimba, Mbula Ngoy Nadege, Long Yu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The Pressure-Volume-Temperature (PVT) properties of crude oil are typically determined through laboratory analysis during the early phases of exploration and field development. However, due to extensive data required, time-consuming nature, and high costs, laboratory methods are often not preferred. Machine learning, with its efficiency and rapid convergence, has emerged as a promising alternative for PVT properties estimation. This study employs the modified particle swarm optimization-based group method of data handling (PSO-GMDH) to develop predictive models for estimating both the oil formation volume factor (OFVF) and bubble point pressure ( P b ). Data from the Mpyo oil field in Uganda were used to create the models. The input parameters included solution gas-oil ratio ( R s ), oil American Petroleum Institute gravity ( API ), specific gravity ( SG ), and reservoir temperature ( T ). The results demonstrated that PSO-GMDH outperformed backpropagation neural networks (BPNN) and radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN), achieving higher correlation coefficients and lower prediction errors during training and testing. For OFVF prediction, PSO-GMDH yielded a correlation coefficient ( R ) of 0.9979 (training) and 0.9876 (testing), with corresponding root mean square error ( RMSE ) values of 0.0021 and 0.0099, and mean absolute error ( MAE ) values of 0.00055 and 0.00256, respectively. For P b prediction, R was 0.9994 (training) and 0.9876 (testing), with RMSE values of 6.08 and 8.26, and MAE values of 1.35 and 2.63. The study also revealed that R s significantly impacts OFVF and P b predictions compared to other input parameters. The models followed physical laws and remained stable, demonstrating that PSO-GMDH is a robust and efficient method for predicting OFVF and P b , offering a time and cost-effective alternative.

Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical EngineeringVol. 17(11)
Central South University (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), Mbeya University of Science and Technology (TZ), University of Kinshasa (CD), Institut National Polytechnique Félix Houphouët-Boigny (CI), South University (US)
China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.