How do farmers value organic fertilisers? An exploratory study on conventional and innovative products

Current trends in the adoption of agricultural innovations aimed at replacing mineral fertilisers with organic fertilisers such as biochar and biochar-compost blends made from various organic wastes have recently been recognised as an important innovation to restore and improve soil fertility and mitigate environmental impacts while implementing the circular economy. A survey was designed to capture socio-economic characteristics and attitudes of farmers towards the use of organic fertilisers. Attitudinal data from 176 farmers were analysed using exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the components associated with their acceptance. Subsequently, the components and socio-economic data were used to delineate clusters of farmers that were matched with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a novel organic fertiliser, a biochar-compost blend. WTP was tasted using a dichotomous choice contingent valuation within the range of €1-300 per tonne. A positive WTP for BCmix was expressed by 63.1% of farmers, with average preferred application rates exceeding 11 t/ha. Five main farmer clusters with different attitudes and appreciation levels for organic fertilisers were identified - The Neutral, The Unready, The Opposed, The Sceptic, and The Engaged- highlighting a range of attitudes and appreciation levels towards organic fertilisers. Interestingly, clusters with a neutral stance towards organic fertilisers showed significantly higher WTP than clusters more actively committed to sustainability, such as The Engaged , a finding that contrasts with prior studies where environmentally committed farmers typically show greater adoption willingness. The study’s insights support targeted market segmentation and inform policy and communication strategies to promote the early adoption of organic fertilisers. • A survey of 176 farmers identified five distinct profiles on organic fertilizers. • Five factors were found to influence farmers on adopting organic fertilizers. • Neutral farmers show higher WTP for biochar than sustainability-focused farmers. • Large farms find biochar management more cost-effective due to economies of scale. • The "Typical" farmer profile can be refined into sub-profiles for better analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Farming System
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100156
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do farmers value organic fertilisers? An exploratory study on conventional and innovative products

Massimiliano Calvia, Maurizio Canavari, Alessandro Buscaroli, Marco Medici et al.
2 citations
Farming System
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
9.66
article

How do farmers value organic fertilisers? An exploratory study on conventional and innovative products

Massimiliano Calvia, Maurizio Canavari, Alessandro Buscaroli, Marco Medici, Nicolas Greggio, Diego Marazza
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Current trends in the adoption of agricultural innovations aimed at replacing mineral fertilisers with organic fertilisers such as biochar and biochar-compost blends made from various organic wastes have recently been recognised as an important innovation to restore and improve soil fertility and mitigate environmental impacts while implementing the circular economy. A survey was designed to capture socio-economic characteristics and attitudes of farmers towards the use of organic fertilisers. Attitudinal data from 176 farmers were analysed using exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the components associated with their acceptance. Subsequently, the components and socio-economic data were used to delineate clusters of farmers that were matched with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a novel organic fertiliser, a biochar-compost blend. WTP was tasted using a dichotomous choice contingent valuation within the range of €1-300 per tonne. A positive WTP for BCmix was expressed by 63.1% of farmers, with average preferred application rates exceeding 11 t/ha. Five main farmer clusters with different attitudes and appreciation levels for organic fertilisers were identified - The Neutral, The Unready, The Opposed, The Sceptic, and The Engaged- highlighting a range of attitudes and appreciation levels towards organic fertilisers. Interestingly, clusters with a neutral stance towards organic fertilisers showed significantly higher WTP than clusters more actively committed to sustainability, such as The Engaged , a finding that contrasts with prior studies where environmentally committed farmers typically show greater adoption willingness. The study’s insights support targeted market segmentation and inform policy and communication strategies to promote the early adoption of organic fertilisers. • A survey of 176 farmers identified five distinct profiles on organic fertilizers. • Five factors were found to influence farmers on adopting organic fertilizers. • Neutral farmers show higher WTP for biochar than sustainability-focused farmers. • Large farms find biochar management more cost-effective due to economies of scale. • The "Typical" farmer profile can be refined into sub-profiles for better analysis.

Farming SystemVol. 3(3)
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), UniLaSalle (FR), University of Bologna (IT)
EIT Food
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
9.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.