Use of Apple Airtag to track urban wildlife: Proof of concept with Harris's hawks

Abstract Accurate tracking of the movement of wildlife is important for understanding the behavior, spatial use, and resource selection of a species. While traditional methods like Very High Frequency (VHF) transmitters have been widely used, newer technologies, such as GPS data loggers and Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) transmitters, have provided more detailed data at a higher cost. We evaluated the effectiveness of Apple Airtags, a Bluetooth tracking device that can be purchased for ~US$30, for tracking Harris's hawks ( Parabuteo unicinctus ) in the Rio Grande Valley, Texas, USA. We tagged 9 Harris's hawks with VHF transmitters and 6 with Airtags, and we tracked their movements over 12 weeks. While VHF transmitters provided only 36 locations (approximately 4 locations per hawk) due to limitations of field time, Airtags yielded 236 locations (approximately 39 locations per hawk), of which 181 were usable for MCP analysis. The cost per location for usable data was significantly lower for Airtags, at US$0.96 per location compared to US$69.08 per location using VHF telemetry. We also conducted a home range analysis using the Minimum Convex Polygon (MCP) method. For the 3 Harris's hawks equipped with Airtags that provided sufficient data for analysis, we estimated a 95% MCP home range of 284 ha for an adult and 133.5 ha on average for 2 juveniles. Core 50% MCP home ranges were 31.9 ha for the adult and a mean of 13.5 ha for juveniles. Our results suggest that Apple Airtags can be used for tracking urban wildlife, allowing analysis of home range areas and spatial use patterns. We note, however, that there are limitations to this technology, including reliance on proximity to Apple devices and finite battery life, and studies should be designed with these limitations in mind. Airtags offer a low‐cost alternative for researchers working with medium‐sized and large species in areas with high human activity aiming to collect remote locations on wildlife.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1599
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Apple Airtag to track urban wildlife: Proof of concept with Harris's hawks

Andrew J. Gregory, James C. Bednarz, Brooke A. Poplin
1 citations
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Use of Apple Airtag to track urban wildlife: Proof of concept with Harris's hawks

Andrew J. Gregory, James C. Bednarz, Brooke A. Poplin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Accurate tracking of the movement of wildlife is important for understanding the behavior, spatial use, and resource selection of a species. While traditional methods like Very High Frequency (VHF) transmitters have been widely used, newer technologies, such as GPS data loggers and Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) transmitters, have provided more detailed data at a higher cost. We evaluated the effectiveness of Apple Airtags, a Bluetooth tracking device that can be purchased for ~US$30, for tracking Harris's hawks ( Parabuteo unicinctus ) in the Rio Grande Valley, Texas, USA. We tagged 9 Harris's hawks with VHF transmitters and 6 with Airtags, and we tracked their movements over 12 weeks. While VHF transmitters provided only 36 locations (approximately 4 locations per hawk) due to limitations of field time, Airtags yielded 236 locations (approximately 39 locations per hawk), of which 181 were usable for MCP analysis. The cost per location for usable data was significantly lower for Airtags, at US$0.96 per location compared to US$69.08 per location using VHF telemetry. We also conducted a home range analysis using the Minimum Convex Polygon (MCP) method. For the 3 Harris's hawks equipped with Airtags that provided sufficient data for analysis, we estimated a 95% MCP home range of 284 ha for an adult and 133.5 ha on average for 2 juveniles. Core 50% MCP home ranges were 31.9 ha for the adult and a mean of 13.5 ha for juveniles. Our results suggest that Apple Airtags can be used for tracking urban wildlife, allowing analysis of home range areas and spatial use patterns. We note, however, that there are limitations to this technology, including reliance on proximity to Apple devices and finite battery life, and studies should be designed with these limitations in mind. Airtags offer a low‐cost alternative for researchers working with medium‐sized and large species in areas with high human activity aiming to collect remote locations on wildlife.

Wildlife Society BulletinVol. 49(3)
University of North Texas (US)
Animal Behavior Society, Association of Field Ornithologists
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.